2024年4月6日发(作者:)
2020年考研英语一试题
2020年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(一)试题
SectionIUseofEnglish
Directions:
thebestword(s)foreachnumberedblankandmarkA,B,CorDon
theANSWERSHEET.(10points)
Eveniffamiliesdon’tsitdowntoeattogetherasfrequentlyasbefore,millionsofBritonswill
nonethelesshavegotasharethisweekendofoneofthenation’sgreattraditions:theSundayroast.
1acoldwinter’sday,fewculinarypleasurescan
3
ereportnow,thefoodpolice
4todamageouraredeterminedthatthis
health.
TheFoodStandardsAuthority(FSA)has
should7
5apublicwarningabouttherisksofacompound
ansthatpeople
8toasttheirbread.
9studieshaveshownthatacrylamide
12
,it
calledacrylamidethatformsinsomefoodscooked
shouldberenderedyetanotherguiltypleasure
crispingtheirroastpotatoes,rejectthin-crustpizzasandonly
10
Butwhereistheevidencetosupportsuchalarmistadvice?
cancauseneurologicaldamageinmice,thereisno
Scientistssaythecompoundis11
evidencethatitcausescancerinhumans.
13tofollowtheFSAadvice.14
tocausecancerbuthavenohardscientificproof.
theprecautionaryprinciple,itcouldbearguedthatitis
15.
Doubtlessapieceofboiledbeefcanalwaysbe
FSAsaysitisnottellingpeopletocutoutroastfoods
However,its
just20
19
withnoonelistening.
16
wasrumouredthatsmokingcausedcancerforyearsbeforetheevidencewasfoundtoprovea
uponSundayalongsidesomesteamed
17,the
18,buttoreducetheirlifetimeintake.
vegetables,ldlifebeworthliving?
nthealthscares
1.
2.
3.
4.
ce
ified
s
n
teed
y
se
led
s
nce
ent
eged
-1-
2020年考研英语一试题
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
d
ed
rly
al
ostof
ate
ll
ation
tance
lly
ition
lly
ary
icient
asisof
nition
lance
ir
antly
ence
led
lly
ve
rastto
ble
icular
n
ral
lly
gn
sive
tionto
sting
l
tion
ief
ly
e
up
SectionIIReadingComprehension
PartA
Directions:
thequestionsaftereachtextbychoosingA,B,
youranswersontheANSWERSHEET.(40points)
Text1
AgroupofLabourMPs,amongthemYvetteCooper,arebringinginthenewyearwithacallto
instituteaUK“townofculture”posalisthatitshouldsitalongsidetheexistingcityof
culturetitle,whichwasheldbyHullin2017,and
-2-
2020年考研英语一试题
hercolleaguesarguethatthesuccessofthecrownforHull,whereitbroughtin£220mofinvestment
andanavalancheofarts,n’stowns,itistrue,arenot
preventedfromapplying,buttheygenerallylacktheresourcestoputtogetherabidtobeattheir
fcultureawardcould,itisargued,becomeanannualevent,attracting
fundingandcreatingjobs.
SomemightseetheproposalasaboobyprizeforthefactthatBritainisnolongerabletoapply
forthemuchmoreprestigioustitleofEuropeancapitalofculture,asought-afterawardbaggedby
mightspeculatethattheUKisonthevergeof
disappearingintoanendlessfeverofself-celebrationinitsdesperationtoreinventitselfforthe
post-Brexitworld:aftertownofculture,whoknowswhatwillfollow—villageofculture?Suburbof
culture?Hamletofculture?
run“yearofculture”washesin
andoutofaplacelikethetide,bringingprominenceforaspellbutleavingnolastingbenefitstothe
llysuccessfulholdersofsuchtitlesarethosethatdoagreatdealmorethanfill
hoansformthe
aspirationsofthepeoplewholivethere;theynudgetheself-imageofthecityintoabolderandmore
rdtogetright,andrequiresaremarkabledegreeofvision,aswellas
cooperationbetweencityauthorities,theprivatesector,communitygroupsandculturalorganisations.
Butitcanbedone:Glasgow'syearasEuropeancapitalofculturecancertainlybeseenasoneofa
complexseriesoffactorsthathaveturnedthecityintothepowerhouseofart,musicandtheatrethatit
remainstoday.
A“townofculture”couldbenotjustabouttheartsbutabouthonouringatown'speculiarities—
helpingsustainitshighstreet,
Wright,theculturesecretary,shouldwelcomethispositive,hope-filledproposal,andturnitinto
action.
andhercolleaguesarguethata“townofculture”awardcould
idatethetown-citytiesinBritain.
ecooperationamongBritain’stowns.
setheeconomicstrengthofBritain’stowns.
ritain'slimitedresourcesonculturalevents.
ingtoParagraph2,theproposalmightberegardedbysomeas
blecompromise.
-3-
2020年考研英语一试题
-deceivingattempt.
-catchingbonus.
cessibletarget.
horsuggeststhatatitleholderissuccessfulonlyifit
ourstomaintainitsimage.
heaspirationsofitspeople.
itslocalartstoprominence.
stoitslong-termgrowth.
wismentionedinParagraph3topresent
astingcase.
rtingexample.
roundstory.
edtopic.
theauthor’sattitudetowardstheproposal?
cal.
ive.
able.
al.
Text2
istsneedjournalsinwhichto
publishtheirresearch,cientists
performthespecialisedworkofpeerreviewalsoforfree,becauseitisacentralelementinthe
acquisitionofstatusandtheproductionofscientificknowledge.
Withthecontentofpaperssecuredforfree,thepublisherneedsonlytofindamarketforits
hiscentury,ificpublishers
routinelyreportprofitmarginsapproaching40%ontheiroperations,atatimewhentherestofthe
-4-
2020年考研英语一试题
publishingindustryisinanexistentialcrisis.
TheDutchgiantElsevier,whichclaimstopublish25%ofthescientificpapersproducedinthe
world,madeprofitsofmorethan£900mlastyear,whileUKuniversitiesalonespentmorethan
£210min2016toenableresearcherstoaccesstheirownpubliclyfundedresearch;bothfiguresseem
toriseunstoppablydespiteincreasinglydesperateeffortstochangethem.
Themostdrastic,andthoroughlyillegal,reactionhasbeentheemergenceofSci-Hub,akindof
globalphotocopierforscientificpapers,setupin2012,whichnowclaimstoofferaccesstoevery
cessofSci-Hub,whichreliesonresearcherspassing
oncopiestheyhavethemselveslegallyaccessed,showsthelegalecosystemhaslostlegitimacyamong
itsusersandmustbetransformedsothatitworksforallparticipants.
InBritai
anhalfofallBritishscientificresearchisnowpublished
underopenaccessterms:eitherfreelyavailablefromthemomentofpublication,orpaywalledfora
yearormoresothatthepublisherscanmakeaprofitbeforebeingplacedongeneralrelease.
hershave
respondedtothedemandthattheymaketheirproductfreetoreadersbychargingtheirwritersfeesto
angefromaround£500to$5,tlastyear
pointedoutthatthecostsbothofsubscriptionsandofthese“articlepreparationcosts"hadbeen
waysthescientificpublishingmodelresemblesthe
economyofthesocialinternet:labourisprovidedfreeinexchangeforthehopeofstatus,whilehuge
cases,weneedarebalancingof
power.
ificpublishingisseenas"alicencetoprintmoney"partlybecause
dinghasenjoyedasteadyincrease.
ketingstrategyhasbeensuccessful.
mentforpeerreviewisreduced.
tentacquisitioncostsnothing.
ingtoParagraphs2and3,scientificpublisherslikeElsevierhave
dmainlyonuniversitylibraries.
roughanexistentialcrisis.
dthepublishingindustry.
-5-
2020年考研英语一试题
edresearchersgenerously.
stheauthorfeelaboutthesuccessofSci-Hub?
ed.
d.
ned.
aged.
elearnedfromParagraphs5and6thatopenaccessterms
ublisherssomeroomtomakemoney.
publishingmucheasierforscientists.
thecostofpublicationsubstantially.
iversitiesfromfinancialburdens.
fthefollowingcharacterisesthescientificpublishingmodel?
ubscriptionisoffered.
triumphsoverstatus.
rewellcontrolled.
feedonthemany.
Text3
Progressivesoftensupportdiversitymandatesasapathtoequalityandawaytoleveltheplaying
toooftensuchpoliciesareaninsincereformofvirtue-signalingthatbenefitsonlythe
mostprivilegedanddoeslittletohelpaveragepeople.
ApairofbillssponsoredbyMassachusettsstateSenatorJasonLewisandHouseSpeakerPro
TemporePatriciaHaddad,toensure"genderparity"onboardsandcommissions,provideacasein
point.
HaddadandLewisareconcernedthatmorethanhalfthestate-governmentboardsarelessthan
rtoensurethatelitewomenhavemoresuchopportunities,theyhave
illsbecomelaw,stateboardsandcommissionswillbe
-6-
2020年考研英语一试题
requiredtosetaside50percentofboardseatsforwomenby2022.
ThebillsaresimilartoameasurerecentlyadoptedinCalifornia,whichlastyearbecamethefirst
ingthemeasure,CaliforniaGovernor
JerryBrownadmittedthatthelaw,whichexpresslyclassifiespeopleonthebasisofsex,isprobably
unconstitutional.
TheUSSupremeCourtfrownsonsex-basedclassificationsunlesstheyaredesignedtoaddress
an"important"etheCalifornialawappliestoallboards,evenwherethereisno
historyofpriordiscrimination,courtsarelikelytorulethatthelawviolatestheconstitutional
guaranteeof"equalprotection."
Butaresuchgovernmentmandatesevennecessary?Femaleparticipationoncorporateboards
maynotcurrentlymirrorthepercentageofwomeninthegeneralpopulation,butsowhat?
Thenumberofwomenoncorporateboardshasbeensteadilyincreasingwithoutgovernment
ingtoastudybyCatalyst,between2010and2015theshareofwomenonthe
boardsofglobalcorporationsincreasedby54percent.
Requiringcompaniestomakegendertheprimaryqualificationforboardmembershipwill
exactlywhathappenedwhenNorway
adoptedanationwidecorporategenderquota.
WritinginTheNewRepublic,AliceLeenotesthatincreasingthenumberofopportunitiesfor
boardmembershipwithoutincreasingthepoolofqualifiedwomentoserveonsuchboardshasledtoa
"goldenskirt"phenomenon,wherethesameelitewomenscoopupmultipleseatsonavarietyof
boards.
Nexttimesomebodypushescorporatequotasasawaytopromotegenderequity,rememberthat
suchpoliciesarelargelyself-servingmeasuresthatmaketheirsponsorsfeelgoodbutdolittletohelp
averagewomen.
horbelievesthatthebillssponsoredbyLewisandHaddadwill
ttletoreducegenderbias.
hreattothestategovernment.
omen'spositioninpolitics.
ybroadencareeroptions.
fthefollowingistrueoftheCaliforniameasure?
rritatedprivatebusinessowners.
lcomedbytheSupremeCourt.
-7-
发布者:admin,转转请注明出处:http://www.yc00.com/web/1712366221a2046902.html
评论列表(0条)