2024年5月3日发(作者：)

开发核能源弊大于利

第一：核能是绿色能源吗？

也许你会认为核能不会像煤炭和石

油等化石燃料那样产生大气污染，也

不会排放温室气体二氧化碳，但是你

错了！其实事实完全相反。用于核电

的原料之一是铀，铀浓缩设施需要依

靠煤炭提供电力的工厂。这些工厂向

大气排放了大量的的二氧化碳。此外

铀浓缩过程还会排放大量氯氟烃，氯

氟烃除了导致臭氧层变得稀薄以外，

还是比二氧化碳强度高一万到两万

倍的温室气体。此外由于核能发电热

效率较低，比一般化石燃料电厂排放

更多废热到环境中，故核能电厂的热

污染较严重。而且，在核发电过程中，

每年又要向空气和水中持续排放超

过上千万居里的放射性同位素。尽管

核工业坚持说，某些放射性物质从生

物角度不会引起严重后果。但事实远

非如此。

First: Nuclear energy is green energy

sources?

You might think that nuclear energy is

not like coal and oil and other fossil

fuels that produce air pollution,

greenhouse gas emissions of carbon

dioxide will not, but you are wrong!

Quite the opposite in fact. One of the

raw materials for nuclear power is

uranium, uranium enrichment facilities

need to rely on coal to power plants.

These factories are a lot of the

atmosphere of carbon dioxide

emissions. Besides uranium

enrichment process also emit large

quantities of chlorofluorocarbons, CFCs

cause the ozone layer becomes thinner

than in addition to, or higher than the

carbon dioxide intensity 10000-2 times

of greenhouse gases. Furthermore,

since the thermal efficiency of nuclear

power generation lower than the

average fossil fuel power plants emit

more heat to the environment, so the

nuclear power plant thermal pollution

is more serious. Moreover, in the

process of nuclear power, but also to

the annual emissions of air and water

continue to exceed tens of millions of

curies of radioisotopes. Although the

nuclear industry insists that some of

the radioactive material from a

biological point of view does not cause

serious consequences. However, far

from it.

第二：核能是高效能源吗？

核工业的真正经济价值从来就没有被

认真地分析过，这其中包括铀浓缩的

成本，发生核事故后的巨大经济索赔，

拆卸到期反应堆成本，现有核反应堆

的维护，核原料和废料的运输和将放

射性核废料储存25万年的所需费用。

这些总和比获得的商业价值高10倍

乃至百倍千倍！核电的真实成本，是

其燃料成本的上百倍。人类目前只是

被核电站其燃料成本的低廉所迷惑！

第三：核能的利用安全吗？

1988 年联合国发表了一项报

告，警告说，如果打起核大战，

地球上的50 亿人将有40 亿人

在当时死伤或在战后饿死。我们

都知道

由于发电的核原料在制造过程

中设计敏感技术---铀浓缩，不

排除有些国家打着和平利用铀

浓缩的幌子来发展自己的用于

战争的核技术 ，因为每一座

1000兆瓦的核反应堆每年就可

产生200公斤的钚。钚是核武器

所需的燃料。5公斤钚就可以制

造一枚原子弹。而一个反应堆每

年可以产生200公斤的钚。因此

从理论上说，任何一个拥有一个

核电站的国家每年可以制造40

颗原子弹。"

进入20世纪90年代末，地区性

The true economic value of the

nuclear industry has never been

seriously analyzed, including

the cost of uranium enrichment,

a nuclear accident the huge

economic claims, the cost of

dismantling the reactor due,

maintenance of existing nuclear

reactors, nuclear materials and

waste transportation and

radioactive nuclear waste

storage cost of 25 million years.

The total commercial value than

the gain of 10 times or even

hundred thousand times! The

true costs of nuclear power is a

hundred times its fuel costs.

Nuclear power plant is currently

the only human being fooled by

the low fuel costs!

1988 United Nations issued a report, warning that

if the playing nuclear war, 50 billion people on

earth will have 40 million people were killed or

injured or starved to death after the war. We all

know the power of nuclear materials in the

manufacturing process design --- sensitive

uranium enrichment technology, the name of

some countries do not rule out the guise of

peaceful use of uranium enrichment to develop

their own nuclear technology for war, because

each one 1,000-megawatt The reactor can

produce 200 kg per year of plutonium. Plutonium

is the fuel needed for nuclear weapons. 5

kilograms of plutonium can produce a nuclear

bomb. And a reactor can produce 200 kg per year

of plutonium. Therefore, in theory, any country

has a nuclear power plant can produce 40 atomic

bombs per year. "Beginning of the 20th century,

late 90s, the regional nuclear crisis began to

frequent outbreaks, first in South Asia India and

的核危机开始频频爆发，先是南

亚地区的印度和巴基斯坦相继

进行多次核试验，之后不久在中

东地区，伊朗核问题也被正式捅

上了台面，西方国家纷纷指责伊

朗以和平研究为幌子研制核武

器。就在国际社会为伊朗核问题

一筹莫展的同时，原本就已经让

人头大的朝鲜核问题再次出现

反复，全球防扩散机制出现了最

严重的危机已经是不争的事实。

1986年前苏联切尔诺贝利核电

站发生爆炸，受污染面积达３９

０万平方公里。在过去20年间，

切尔诺贝利核事故受害者总计

达900多万人，完全消除这场浩

劫对自然环境的影响至少需要

800年，而持续的核辐射危险将

持续10万年。1979年发生在美国

宾夕法尼亚州三哩岛核电站的

一次严重放射性物质泄漏事

故 。1977年，斯洛伐克境内的

核电站反应堆因温度过高导致

事故，几乎酿成一场大规模环境

灾难。1957年前苏联核事故造成

70-80吨核废料发生爆炸并散播

至800平方公里的土地上····

除了可怕的核泄漏之外，在核生

产过程中产生的核废料，极少有

人知道它处理的难度，这也是造

成公众对核电站抱无所谓态度

的主要原因。核废料不同于废电

池，统一收集密闭封存就可以高

Pakistan conducted nuclear tests, the Middle East

shortly after the Iranian nuclear issue was also

stabbed on the table formally, the Western

countries have accused Iran of developing nuclear

weapons under the guise of peace studies. on the

Iranian nuclear issue, the international community

to do nothing while people had to have a big head

again repeated North Korean nuclear issue, the

global non-proliferation mechanism is the most

serious crisis is an indisputable fact. because

nuclear technology is not only for the military will

be a threat to human security, and nuclear

technology itself is extremely dangerous. In fact

the history of the nuclear leaks had caused

endless disaster ... ...

Soviet Union in 1986 the Chernobyl nuclear plant

explosion, contaminated an area of 390 square

kilometers. In the past 20 years, the victims of the

Chernobyl nuclear accident totaled more than 900

million people, completely eliminate this

catastrophe on the natural environment at least

800 years, and continuing danger of nuclear

radiation will last 10 years. In the United States in

1979, Three Mile Island nuclear power plant,

Pennsylvania, a serious leakage of radioactive

material. In 1977, Slovakia's nuclear reactor

accidents caused by high temperature, nearly

caused a massive environmental disaster. 1957

Soviet nuclear accident 70-80 years ago, tons of

nuclear waste exploded and spread to 800 square

kilometers of land on the • • • • In addition to the

terrible nuclear accident, the nuclear production of

nuclear waste generated in the process, very few

people know the difficulty of treatment, which is

causing public unconcerned attitude of the main

reasons for nuclear power plants. Unlike nuclear

waste batteries, a unified collection of airtight seal

can sit back and relax. Nuclear waste can not be

completely exhausted in the nuclear material still

has a strong radioactive, and has left a long time,

the characteristics of severe toxicity. Even if the

storage of more than a million years, the

枕无忧了。核废料中不能被完全

用尽的核物质仍具有极强的放

射性，且具有残留时间长、毒性

剧烈的特点。即使贮存过百万

年，其残留物质中的核辐射剂量

仍能超过允许剂量的一千万倍

以上。然而不幸的是， 当今处

理核废料主流方式任然为封存

填埋，要寻找一处安全、永久存

放核废料的地点。这个地点要求

物理环境特别稳定，长久地不受

水和空气的侵蚀，并能经受住地

震、火山、爆炸的冲击。 但数

百年后，这些存放地点会不会发

生破坏是无法预料的。 如果不

能妥善处置将会给当地环境带

来毁灭性影响。

remaining nuclear material in the dose of radiation

doses still a million times more than allowed above.

Unfortunately, today the mainstream way of

dealing with nuclear waste is then either sealed

landfill, to find a safe, permanent storage of

nuclear waste sites. This site requires the physical

environment, especially stable, long erosion from

water and air, and able to withstand earthquakes,

volcanoes, the explosion. But a few hundred years

later, the location of damage will not occur is

unpredictable. If not properly disposed of will be

devastating to the local environmental impact.

历史的教训告诉我们，核电站在运行

时不能出半点差池。问题是" 人有失

手，马有乱蹄"，虽然我们可以通过诸

多努力将这种情况的出现尽可能地减

少或推迟，但是做到绝对杜绝人为失

误是不可能的。我们对所有安全措施

的严守都只能是为我们提供一种近似

的而非彻底的安全。

为了人类的未来，应该严格限制人类

使用核能。

The lessons of history tell us that nuclear

power is not the slightest in the run-time

makes a mistake. The question is, "people

have missed, horse hoof disorder",

although many efforts we can through the

emergence of this situation as much as

possible to reduce or delay, but be

absolutely impossible to eliminate human

error. We strictly observe all safety

measures are only provided us with an

approximate rather than complete safety.

For the future of humanity, should strictly

limit human use of nuclear energy.

第四：发展核电走的是先污染

后治理的老路！

作为全球第四大经济体，德国

正在考虑永久放弃核能源转

而制定了一个新的风电发展

长远规划，到2050年占总用

电量的50％。法国是世界上

核电发电比例最高的国家，但

是其政府早在几年前就已决

定淘汰核电，并制订了一个时

间表逐步实现能源无核化！美

国清洁能源产业发展的一个

重点目标是要大幅提升可再

生能源在能源消耗中的比例

奥巴马在就职演说中表达出

对于发展新能源的热情：“我

们将利用太阳、风和土壤来为

我们的汽车和工厂提供能源”

"

As the world's fourth-largest economy, Germany is

considering a permanent switch to give up its

nuclear energy has developed a new long-term wind

power development plan, by 2050 50% of the total

electricity consumption. France is the world's

countries with the highest proportion of nuclear

power generation, but the government had already

decided to phase out nuclear power several years

ago and developed a timetable for the progressive

realization of the denuclearization of energy! U.S.

clean energy industry as a key goal is to significantly

increase renewable energy in energy consumption in

the proportion of Barack Obama expressed in his

inaugural speech, the enthusiasm for the

development of new energy: "We will use solar, wind

and soil for our cars and our factories

第五：我们还有更好的选择！

人类现如今核能利用的主要

方向是核能发电。但在我方

看来，全球“禁核”照样能

实现完整的能源供应。

风电一直是世界上增长最快

的能源，装机容量每年增长

超过30％。

全球可再生的风能资源是整

个世界预期电力需求的2倍。

而且目前国际上已经能做

到，风能度电成本低于核能，

Human use of nuclear energy are now the main

direction of nuclear power. However, in our view, the

global "no nuclear" can still achieve a complete supply

of energy. Wind power has been the world's fastest

growing energy sources, more than 30% annual

growth in installed capacity. Renewable wind energy

resources worldwide is expected electricity demand

throughout the world 2 times. And now the

international community has to do less than the cost

of wind electricity of nuclear energy.

第六：这不仅仅是个能源问题，中国的能源开发重

点不应该是核能！

中国和许多发展中国家一样，处于重工业发展的

中期，为满足社会经济发展的需要，能源消耗处于

快速上升上时期。 面对全球气候变暖，每一个人都

有责任不保护我们共同的地球，这是无可非议的。

美国新任能源部长 朱棣文上台第一个讲话就讲了，

说是我们美国的很多产品之所以价格高，是因为我

们在节能减排上做了大量的投入，你中国之所以低，

你是因为没有投，因此我要代表美国人民收你能源

税。

美国现任总统奥巴马写过一本书《无畏的希望》 ，

其中有两句话很深刻：“ 一个控制不了能源的国家

也控制不了自己的未来”、“增加美国竞争力最后一

个关键的投资是能源基础设施” 其一，拉起低碳经

济大旗，可以有效的打击政治对手。在美国看来，

其主要政治竞争对手一是俄罗斯，二是中国，三是

潜在的印度。 其二，拉起低碳经济大旗，可以在“世

界金融中心”失去作用的情况下，以能源排污许可

费和新能源技术作为向发展中国家的提款机 ！

总之种种迹象都表明，核能开发弊大于利！现如今

对核能的开发也是一种赌博！就以核电站为例，我

们赌的是在现有设计方案完全正确，施工队伍完全

按照标准施工，核电站寿命40年内电站工作人员无

丝毫马虎，无大的自然灾害，无恐怖袭击，无军事

打击！而我们的赌注是我们子孙后代的幸福啊。更

何况大家都知道这小概率事件几乎不会发生！

In short all the indications

are that the development

of nuclear energy more

harm than good! Now the

development of nuclear

energy is a gamble! Take

nuclear power plants, for

example, our bet is entirely

correct in the current

design and construction

teams in full accordance

with standard construction,

nuclear power station life

of 40 years without the

slightest careless staff, no

major natural disasters, no

terrorist attacks, no

military strike! Our bet is

the happiness of our

children and grandchildren

ah. Moreover, we all know

that this is almost a small

probability event does not

occur!

据美国国家科学学院所公布的报

告指出，绝大多数联邦政府用以

制造核子弹的地点将不可能完全

清理干净，造成这些土地再也无

法为大众使用。 报告中说：“在

许多地方，无论是具幅射性或不

具幅射性的危险废料都将继续存

留。遗害人类与环境达数万或数

十万年之久。这些对人类与环境

所造成难以承受的危

害，将很难彻底地把它们清除，

不论是现在或是可预见的未来。

而这样的说法其实并不新鲜。这

份由能源部委托所汇整的报告则

更进一步强调，政府可以试

着宣布部分地区永久禁止入内，

但却缺乏科技、金钱和管理技术

来防止污染向外蔓延。此外，部

分污染物已“移出”核弹工厂的

界线，其它地方也将出现同样的

现象。

毕竟搭建围墙把这个地方围住

是一回事，如何能永远地维持净

空则又是另一回事。

事实上，政府对这些土地使

用的掌控已出现松动.

According to the U.S. National Academy of

Sciences report published by the vast majority of

federal government sites for the manufacture of

nuclear bombs will not be completely cleaned up,

causing the land no longer to the general public.

The report said: "In many places, both with

radiation or radiation of non-hazardous waste will

continue to persist. Harm to humans and the

environment of hundreds of thousands or

millions of years. These are human beings and

the environment the harm caused unbearable,

will be difficult to completely remove them, either

now or in the foreseeable future. and such

allegations are not new. This report by the

Department of Energy commissioned a report

compiled by the greater emphasis, The

Government can try to declare a permanent ban

from entering some areas, but the lack of

technology, money and management techniques

to prevent the spread of contamination out. In

addition, some pollutants have been "removed"

the boundaries of nuclear plants, other parts of

the same phenomenon will occur. After all, this

place surrounded by walls built is one thing, how

can you always maintain clearance is another

matter. In fact, the use of these lands has been

to loosen the control of.