For example I have typed array like this:

var a = new Int32Array([3,8,6,1,6,9]);

When I try to call a.sort(), it doesn't work.

What is the best way to sort typed arrays? What about performance, can we sort typed arrays faster than regular arrays?

For example I have typed array like this:

var a = new Int32Array([3,8,6,1,6,9]);

When I try to call a.sort(), it doesn't work.

What is the best way to sort typed arrays? What about performance, can we sort typed arrays faster than regular arrays?

• javascript
• performance
• typed-arrays

Share Improve this question Follow asked Feb 18, 2014 at 0:20 LukaLuka 3,09044 gold badges2121 silver badges3434 bronze badges 3

• 2 Have you tried [].sort.call(a)? – Felix Kling Commented Feb 18, 2014 at 0:25
• 2 @Felix Kling: ^ the answer (I'd rather use Array.prototype.call though) – zerkms Commented Feb 18, 2014 at 0:28
• 1 ES6 introduced TypedArray.prototype.sort: stackoverflow./a/37684611/1647737 – le_m Commented Jun 7, 2016 at 16:31

Add a ment  | 

2 Answers 2

Sorted by: Reset to default 6

JavaScript array methods are defined in such a way that they are applicable to any array-like object, not only to actual instances of Array. So you can use:

Array.prototype.sort.call(a, function(a, b) { return a - b; });

The custom callback is necessary because JS sorts the values lexicographically by default. See also How to sort an array of integers correctly.

The ECMAScript 2015 Language Specification introduced a .sort() method for typed arrays.

var a = new Int32Array([3, 8, 6, 1, 6, 9]);
console.log(a.sort()); // [1, 3, 6, 6, 8, 9]

There are some differences though, e. g. regarding the default pare function:

[TypedArray.prototype.sort] performs a numeric parison rather than the string parison used in [Array.prototype.sort].

console.log(new Array([1, 10, 2]).sort()); // [1, 10, 2]
console.log(new Int32Array([1, 10, 2]).sort()); // [1, 2, 10]