I have a problem with creating a variable that first will increase value (for example) form 0 to 10, and after that it wil go back from 10 to 0. So 0,1,2,3...10,10,9,8,7...0 (and so on) The main idea looks like this:

var count = 10;

var counter = setInterval(timer, 500); 

function timer() {
  count = count-1;

  if (count == 0) {
        count = 10;
    }

}
console.log(counter);

But it will only go from 0 to 10 all the time. How to make that 'eback' thing? Thank you for help.

I have a problem with creating a variable that first will increase value (for example) form 0 to 10, and after that it wil go back from 10 to 0. So 0,1,2,3...10,10,9,8,7...0 (and so on) The main idea looks like this:

var count = 10;

var counter = setInterval(timer, 500); 

function timer() {
  count = count-1;

  if (count == 0) {
        count = 10;
    }

}
console.log(counter);

But it will only go from 0 to 10 all the time. How to make that 'eback' thing? Thank you for help.

• javascript

Share Improve this question Follow asked Aug 18, 2013 at 13:19 AmayAmay 1,52155 gold badges2929 silver badges5757 bronze badges 1

• Just do count mod 0` which, in Javascript, will look like: count%10. – jeremy Commented Aug 18, 2013 at 13:22

Add a ment  | 

6 Answers 6

Sorted by: Reset to default 2

Try to change the increment value

var count = 10;
var counterIncrement=-1;
var counter = setInterval(timer, 500); 

function timer() {
  count = count+counterIncrement;
  if (count == 0 || count == 10 ) {
        counterIncrement = -counterIncrement;
    }
  console.log(count);
}

Here's another solution that produces the correct output (with doubled zeros and tens) but is much shorter than @Teemu's one:

var count = 0, step = 1;
var counter = setInterval(function() {
    if (count<0 || count>10) // when we're outside the range
        count += step *= -1; // change direction and go back into
    console.log(count);
    count += step;
}, 500);

Here is another solution as I understood :

var count = 0;
var flag = false;
setInterval(function(){timer()}, 500); 

function timer() {
  console.log(count); 
  if (flag){
    count = count - 1;
  }
  if(!flag){
    count = count + 1;
  }

  if (count =< 0) {
     flag=false;
  }
  if (count >= 10) {
     flag = true;
  }

}

I'd use setTimeout()s instead of setInterval(), something like this:

var count = 0, dir = 1, end = [0, 10], index = 1, counter,
    timer = function () {
        console.log(count);
        if (count === end[index]) {
            dir = -dir;
            index += dir;
            counter = setTimeout(timer, 500);
            return;
        }
        count += dir;
        counter = setTimeout(timer, 500);
    };
counter = setTimeout(timer, 500);

A live demo at jsFiddle.

And as Bergi stated, works also with setInterval():

var count = 0, dir = 1, end = [0, 10], index = 1,
     counter = setInterval(function () {
        console.log(count);
        if (count === end[index]) {
            dir = -dir;
            index += dir;
            return;
        }
        count += dir;
    }, 500);

A live demo with interval at jsFiddle.

The advantage of using a separate end array is, that you can dynamically change the limits, if needed.

The problem that I see there is that in the line

var counter = setInterval(timer, 500); 

setInterval is returning you an ID that you can then use to call clearInterval and stop the sequence of calls to timer(). It is not returning you the value of count.

What you want, IMHO is something like this:

var counter = 10;

setInterval(function() {
    counter = counter - 1;

    if (counter < 0) {
        counter = 10;
    }
    console.log(counter);
}, 500);

var count = 10;
var counter = setInterval(timer, 500); 

function timer() {
    if(!this.diff) this.diff=-1;
    count += this.diff;

    if(count==0 || count==10) this.diff=-this.diff;

    console.log(count);
}

This way, you don't pollute global namespace.