Consider this code:
setContext(async (req, { headers }) => {
const token = await getToken(config.resources.gatewayApi.scopes)
const pleteHeader = {
headers: {
...headers,
authorization:
token && token.accessToken ? `Bearer ${token.accessToken}` : '',
} as Express.Request,
}
console.log('accessToken: ', pleteHeader.headers.authorization)
return pleteHeader
})
Which generates the following TS error:
Property 'authorization' does not exist on type 'Request'.
This es from trying to access pleteHeader.headers.authorization
. The property authorization
is indeed not available on the Express.request
interface. It's strange that TypeScript can't infere the type from the literal object, which clearly is of type string
. When not defining the type as Express.Request
an error is thrown about an unsafe any assignment.
Is it required to create a new TS interface just for this one field? Or are we using an incorrect type? The field authorization
looks to be like a monly used field for sending tokens.
Consider this code:
setContext(async (req, { headers }) => {
const token = await getToken(config.resources.gatewayApi.scopes)
const pleteHeader = {
headers: {
...headers,
authorization:
token && token.accessToken ? `Bearer ${token.accessToken}` : '',
} as Express.Request,
}
console.log('accessToken: ', pleteHeader.headers.authorization)
return pleteHeader
})
Which generates the following TS error:
Property 'authorization' does not exist on type 'Request'.
This es from trying to access pleteHeader.headers.authorization
. The property authorization
is indeed not available on the Express.request
interface. It's strange that TypeScript can't infere the type from the literal object, which clearly is of type string
. When not defining the type as Express.Request
an error is thrown about an unsafe any assignment.
Is it required to create a new TS interface just for this one field? Or are we using an incorrect type? The field authorization
looks to be like a monly used field for sending tokens.
4 Answers
Reset to default 3The reason is because you're coercing pleteHeader.headers
into the Express.Request
type. The coerced type overrides the inferred type.
What you can do, is expand that coerced type by doing the following:
as Express.Request & { authorization: string }
or you could create an entirely new type:
type AuthorizedRequest = Express.Request & { authorization: string };
...
as AuthorizedRequest
in my case, I needed to add user & I got error in headers with authorization(req.headers.authorization), me resolve was:
Case 1: 1.1. Where was error(req.headers.authorization), but before i had got similar error but with user:
import { IAuthRequest } from "./../types/user.type";
const checkAuth =
() => async (req: IAuthRequest, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => {
try {
//2. Second i got error here(main problem)
//i got if, i set <req:IRequestUser> for resolve
//problem with <req.user>: Property 'authorization'
//does not exist on type 'Headers'.
//And you need to change <req: IAuthRequest>, and
//resolve problems
if (!req.headers.authorization) throw new Error("Please log in");
const token = req.headers.authorization.split(" ")[1];
if (!process.env.SECRET_ACCESS_TOKEN)
throw new Error("Please create <SECRET_ACCESS_TOKEN> in .env file");
const { decoded, expired } = Jwt.verifyJwtToken(
token,
process.env.SECRET_ACCESS_TOKEN
);
if (expired) return res.status(401).send("Token has been expired");
//1. first error here
//before(Property 'authorization' does not exist on
//type 'Headers'.) i have got error here(Property
//'user' does not exist on type 'Request'.), if
//<req: Request>, you can try resolve this problem
//<req: IRequestUser> and after this, i got error
//with req.headers.authorization (see <2. Second i
//got error ...>, code above)
req.user = decoded;
next();
} catch (err) {
return res.status(400).send(err);
}
};
1.2. In folder named like "types", i have created file <user.type.ts> and added:
export interface IUserData {
_id: string;
email: string;
username: string;
}
export interface IRequestUser extends Request {
user: IUserData;
}
export type IAuthRequest = IRequestUser & {
headers: { authorization: string };
};
You need just delete ments and code above will work correctly, ment only for understanding what was in code before error, and how i resolve this problems
Case 2: after a while I found an even easier way:
import { IAuthRequest } from "./../types/user.type";
const checkAuth =
() => async (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => {
try {
req as IAuthRequest;
//your code...
next();
} catch (err) {
return res.status(400).send(err);
}
};
i hope that maybe it will help to someone
import * as jwt from "jsonwebtoken";
import { NextFunction, Request } from "express";
try{
const authorizationHeader = req.headers.authorization;
//logic for decryption of token and validating empty authorisation header
}
just need to import Request from express it will automatically infer that authorization exists on req headers
Be make sure you import the Request, Response and NextFunction from express.
import { NextFunction, Request, Response } from "express";
export default (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => {
const token = req.headers.authorization;
next();
};
发布者:admin,转转请注明出处:http://www.yc00.com/questions/1742304139a4418597.html
评论列表(0条)