2024年3月15日发(作者：pressured翻译)

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

AllResponsibility

t

a

e

&

Expectation期望

i

l

i

Expectations,and Due Date

b

D

g

n

t

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

i

人

t

a

n

限

s

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

o

n

n

i

n

任

D

限

o

i

期

i

e

t

e

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

o

期

t

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

p

责

e

u

l

成

a

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

m

完

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

Expectation Element G/Y/R DEFINITION

期望要素

G/Y/R

的定义

:

listed,

色期望要求由

Green:

(0) RED sub-elements and (0) YELLOW sub-elements - All sub-elements are

Yellow:

GREEN

(0) RED sub-elements and (1) or more YELLOW sub-elements

黄色：（O)红色子要素和（1）或多个黄色子要素

Red:

(1) or more RED sub-elements

红色：（1）或多个红色子要素

INC:

(1) or more sub-elements not ranked RED, YELLOW or GREEN

INC（1）或多个子要素，没有列出红，黄，绿。

Expectation Sub-element G/Y/R DEFINITION

期望子要素

G/Y/R

的定义

:

G: High Quality of Event / Meets the Expectation and the intent of the Expectation Guidelines / Item Complete

Y: Marginal Quality of Event / Marginally meets the Expectation and the intent of the Expectation Guidelines / Concurred and

R: Unacceptable Quality of Event / Does not meet the Expectation and the intent of the Expectation Guidelines / No plan, Inadequate

I. Planning for Manufacturing Process Capability

制造过程能力策划

INC

I.1. Quality procedures ISO/TS16949 QOS

I.1.1

Supplier's quality system is third-party certified to ISO/TS 16949 requirements.

. Supplier is third party certified to ISO/TS 16949. Include the name of the registrar

供方通过了第三方ISO/TS16949认证。

organization and the date of certification and/or re-certification.

供方通过了第三方执行的ISO/TS16949认证，包括组织名称和认证日期或认证入去。

. Certification has not expired.

证书没有过期

. SOFTWARE SITE ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY AND CERTIFICATION

The software supplier is audited by an official SEI (Software Engineering Institute)

auditing firm and attained, at a minimum, Capability Maturity Model Level 2 certification.

Software developers for this product use the development process for the Capability

Maturity Model level at which they are certified. If assessed at Capability Maturity Model

Level 2, the software supplier has a plan to become certified Capability Maturity Model

Level 3 within twelve (12) months.

软件现场能力评估和认证，软件供方是由官方SEI审核公司审核及至少获得二级成熟能力

模式或认证此产品的开发人员，使用成熟模式能力的等级经过认证来开发过程，若成熟

能力模式评价等级为2，则软件供方有在12月内获得等级3的成熟能力模式的认证计划。

I.1.2

Supplier's environmental system is certified to ISO 14001.

. Supplier is third party certified to ISO 14001. Include the name of the registrar

供方通过了第三方ISO/TS16949认证。

organization and the date of certification and/or re-certification.

供方通过第三方认证的ISO14001，包括组织名称和认证日期或重认证日期。

. Certification has not expired.

证书没有过过期。

I.1.3

X

Supplier's quality manual contains processes for all areas of the site assessment. The quality

. Supplier reviews on an annual basis the policies, procedures, and work instructions to

Rate this

manual is updated as needed to drive statistically valid continual improvements in the supplier's

ensure they are up to date, including Voice of the Customer (VOC) specific

sub-

quality system. Supplier's Senior Management Team, including representatives from

requirements. This may be included in the annual review of internal audits. Action

element by

Manufacturing, Quality, Engineering, and Human Resources perform these reviews.

plans are in place for statistically significant continuous improvements.

entering

供方质量手册包括现场的所有过程，质量手册因需而修订以驱动供方的质量体系有统计数据形式

供方审核以年度为基础的策划，程序和作业指导书，若确保没有被更新，包括顾客声

r, y, or g in的持续改进。供方最高管理层包括来自于制造，质量，工程和人力资源的代表实施评审。

音，特别的要求，这些包括年度内审有数据的持续改进计划。

cell above

. There are records of revisions (change control) to procedures, guidelines and work

instructions that demonstrate that supplier's quality system is being continuously

improved.

有程序，指南，作业指导书的修订记录（更改控制）来证实供方质量系统的持续改进。

1 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

AllResponsibility

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

Expectations,and Due Date

b

D

g

Expectation期望

n

t

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

i

人

t

a

限

n

限

s

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

o

n

n

i

regardless ofRequired for all

n

任

D

o

i

期

i

e

t

e

t

期

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

a

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

o

t

p

责

e

u

l

成

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

m

完

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

I.1.4

listed,

色期望要求由

X

Nonconformances identified in internal audits are not repeated.

. Supplier has an internal quality audit tracking mechanism in place.

Rate this

内部审核识别的不符合项没有重复。

供方有内部审核追踪机制。

sub-. Supplier's "quality manual" includes a procedure for internal audits and corrective

element byaction implementation process

entering

供方质量手册包含内部审核程序和实施纠正措施过程。

r, y, or g in

cell above

. Supplier has an internal audit schedule and audits are being performed according to

schedule

供方有内部审核时间表并依时间表执行审核。

. Does supplier use a "fresh eyes" concept?

NOTE: "Fresh Eyes" review typically involves product review by personnel not directly

associated with the design or manufacture of the product.

供方用“新眼光”概念吗？

“新眼光”典型的产品审核人员是与产品设计或制造非相关的。

. Supplier has records of 3 previous audits, including a list of all non-conformances.

供方有前三次的审核记录，包括所有不符合清单。

. For all non-conformances, action plans are in place to address the root cause that led

to the issue.

所有不符合有导致发生的根本原因及措施计划

. Supplier implements corrective actions in related activities to prevent recurrence of

similar non-conformances.

供方实施纠正措施，预防类似不符合再发生。

. Supplier links issues and corrective actions to customer satisfaction (Supplier uses

customer feedback "Voice of the Customer" to drive the identification of issue root

cause and implementation of permanent corrective action)

供方将问题和顾客满意度纠正措施联系起来，供方利用顾客反馈顾客的声音，以驱动识

别问题的根本原因和执行永久措施。

I.1.5

X

Supplier has a documented process to identify and regularly update customer expectations,

. External Critical to Quality (CTQ) customer expectations are obtained from all affected

Rate this

objectives, and requirements.

customer activities (e.g., Purchasing, STA, PD, Manufacturing Plants, Finance, MP&L);

sub-

expectations, objectives, and requirements.

expectations may include metrics such as, Process Sigma Level, CPU, R/1000, TGW,

element by

供方有文件化的过程去识别和定期更新顾客期望，目标和要求。

PPM, warranty, project timing, PSW timing, response time on customer complaints,

enteringdelivery performance, etc.

r, y, or g in

外部关键质量特性，顾客期望从所有影响顾客的活动中获得（如：采购，STA，CPU，

cell above

R/1000，TGW，PPW，担保，项目时程，PSW时程）顾客抱怨反馈时间，发起绩效等

。

I.1.6

X

Supplier has a documented process to identify and regularly update internal expectations,

. Supplier identifies internal CTQ metrics that are not covered by external metrics.

Rate this

objectives, and requirements.

供方识别没有被外部指标覆盖的内部关键质量特性指标。

sub-

供方有文件化的过程去识别和定期更新内部期望，目标和要求。

element by

. Internal metrics may include internal scrap rates, OEE, down-time, change-over time,

entering

Cpk, DPU, RTY, etc.

r, y, or g in

. 内部指标包含内部不良率，OEE ，CPK，DPU，RTY停机率，换线时间等等。

cell above

I.1.7

Supplier has a documented process to translate internal and external expectations, objectives,

. Supplier's CTQ measurables relate to Key Process Output Variables (KPOV) that

and requirements into QOS measurables.

predict internal and external customer satisfaction.

供方有文件化的过程去转换内部和外部期望，目标和要求到QOS衡量系统。

供方关键质量特性与关键过程输出变量相关联，预测内部和外部顾客满意度。

. Continuous improvements are developed and tracked through internal and external

expectations.

通过内部和外部的期望来开展和追踪持续改进。

2 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

AllResponsibility

t

b

D

i

g

Expectation期望

a

n

t

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

n

限

D

限

o

n

n

o

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

n

i

i

e

t

o

任

t

期

e

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

p

a

责

u

期

l

成

t

D

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

p

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

e

m

完

/

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

I.1.8

listed,

色期望要求由

X

Supplier has a documented process to assign targets and objectives to each QOS measurable.

. Senior management has a process to identify responsible individuals and to establish

Rate this

供方有文化的过程去分配目标到每一个QOS系统。

timing to meet the assigned targets and objectives.

sub-

高层管理有一个过程识别责任者并建立时程满足已分配的目标。

element by

entering

. The QOS process includes quantifiable improvements.

r, y, or g in

QOS 过程包含可测量的改进。

cell above

I.1.9

X

Supplier has a documented process to assign chosen measurables to appropriate management

. A management champion and team is identified for each CTQ measurable, which is

Rate this

levels for review, follow-up, and improvements.

then tracked and reviewed to ensure improvements are being made.

sub-

供方有文件化过程分配已选择的衡量目标供适当的管理评审，跟踪和改进。

每一个关键质量特性被识别的管理层主管和团队，进行追踪和评审以确保改进已执行。

element by

entering

r, y, or g in

. Performance of these measurable are communicated regularly.

cell above

这些衡量指标的绩效定期得到沟通。

I.1.10

X

Supplier utilizes action plans to drive statistically valid continual improvement of chosen metrics

.Action items are being closed on time and show statistically valid improvements.

Rate this

and are tracked at QOS review meetings.

行动项目按时关闭并显示有效的改善。

sub-

供方利用措施计划驱动已选择的指标有效持续改进并在QOS 会议上追踪。

element by

. These improvements are permanent in nature.

entering

这些改进是永久的。

r, y, or g in

. STA invited to supplier's QOS review meetings

cell above

STA被邀请参加 QOS 评审会议。

I.1.11

X

Supplier's management team holds monthly QOS performance review meetings with

. Supplier has evidence of the monthly QOS meetings, including what metrics are being

Rate this

representatives from Manufacturing, Quality, Engineering, and Human Resources. Improvement

tracked and managed.

sub-

actions are taken by cross-functional teams that include all levels of the organization.

供方有没有QOS会议的证据，包括追踪和管控的指标。

element by

供方管理层主持每月QOS绩效评审会议，会议代表来源于制造，质量，工程和人力资源，改善措

entering

施，跨功能小组。

. Supplier has a strategy implementation process with defined roles and responsibilities,

r, y, or g in

and on-going actions with timing.

cell above

供方有实施定义的角色，责任和有时程的行动过程的策略。

. Cross-functional teams have been formed and working meetings are being conducted.

成立跨功能小组并执行工作会议。

. There is evidence of cross-functional team meeting minutes, metrics, and action items

for monthly QOS meetings and daily production meetings with senior plant

management.

跨功能小组会议记录，指标和每月QOS会议的措施羡慕和工厂高层管理生产会议的证据

。

. Supplier is tracking trends to drive continuous improvement.

供方追踪趋势以驱动持续改进。

. Corporate strategy and objectives are linked to assure continuous improvement of

metrics.

公司策略和目标相关联，以保证指标的秩序改进。

. Supplier's continuous improvement projects utilize statistical quality tools, including

what impact these quality tools have on internal and external CTQ metrics.

供方持续改进项目应用统计工具，包括影响内部和外部关键质量特性的质量工具。

. Supplier can demonstrate that an effective daily management review process is in

place with cross-functional representation reviewing and reacting to daily production

metrics. The review process includes meeting minutes and/or an action log.

供方能够证明有效的每日管理过程，跨功能小组代表评审和反应每日生产指标，评审过

程包括会议记录和措施日志。

. Supplier can identify what quality tools are being used and that improving trends are

being tracked.

供方能识别何种质量工具被应用并朱总改进趋势。

I.1.12

X

QOS reviews include a review of all applicable Ford Supplier Improvement Metrics (SIM) key

. Supplier monitors customer plant(s) QR trend and 3MIS warranty R/1000 and CPU

Rate this

process metrics, and customer satisfaction metrics.

performance, and develops action plans to identify and address any negative trends.

sub-

QOS评审包括所有FORD供方改进指标（SIM）关键过程指标和顾客满意指标的评审。

供方监控顾客工厂QR趋势和3MIS担保，R/1000和CPU业绩，为负面趋势制定措施计划

element by

。

entering

r, y, or g in

cell above

. Customer concerns in SIM and quality rejects show improving trends or are at zero

level.

SIM系统上顾客关心和质量拒收显示改进趋势或零水平。

3 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

QOS reviews include a review of all applicable Ford Supplier Improvement Metrics (SIM) key

Evidence 注释/

正措施

Rate this

process metrics, and customer satisfaction metrics.

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

sub-

QOS评审包括所有FORD供方改进指标（

Expectation

SIM）关键过程指标和顾客满意指标的评审。

期望

AllResponsibility

l

i

e

&

element by

g

b

D

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

Expectations,and Due Date

i

人

t

a

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

t

n

n

s

regardless ofRequired for all

n

任

D

限

o

i

i

t

t

期

entering

o

i

e

a

o

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

(*Denotes Focus Area)

p

责

e

R

u

期

l

成

r, y, or g in

a

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

D

p

t

/

c

e

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

e

m

完

cell above

e

e

shall haverated

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

documentedExpectations)

C

x

b

是/。

E

u

S

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

. Supplier can access SIM and review QR details on a daily basis.

供方每日进入SIM系统评审QRS。

. Supplier is tracking all Ford SIM metrics.

供方跟踪所有FORD SIM系统指标。

. Supplier's internal metrics include scrap, downtime, rework, and premium freight, etc.

供方内部审核包括报废，停机，返工和附加运费等。

. Supplier can demonstrate that goals have been set for the Ford SIM metrics with

action plans in place to drive improvement.

供方能证实依FORD SIM系统指标已设定目标并有措施计划以改善。

. Supplier tracks warranty and has an evaluation process to determine what drives

improvement in warranty costs and customer satisfaction.

供方追踪担保并有评价过程以确定在担保费和顾客满意度上如何驱动改进。

I.1.13

X

Metrics monitoring customer satisfaction that are related to supplier manufacturing are

. Supplier assesses how much the TGW, CPU, and R/1000 are related to supplier

Rate this

understood and tracked.

manufacturing and action plans are developed based on those findings.

sub-

顾客满意度监控指标和供方现场相关联被理解和追踪。

供方评价 TGW, CPU, 和 R/1000 与供方现场相关联，并基于这些发现提出措施计划。.

element by

entering

r, y, or g in

.Supplier has a tracking mechanism for short-term and long-term warranty Things-

cell above

Gone-Wrong (TGW).

供方有短期和长期运行不良担保追踪机制。

Note:

Ford's Product Development can provide TGW information

注：

FORD

产品开发能提供运行不良信息。

Note:

Short-term is defined as < 12 months; Long-term is defined as > 12 months

注：短期定义为小于

12

个月，长期定义为大于

12

个月。

. Supplier has a tracking mechanism for long-term and short-term warranty Cost-Per-

Unit (CPU).

供方有短期和长期单位成本的追踪机制。

. Supplier has a tracking mechanism for short-term and long-term warranty R/1000.w 共

犯有短期和长期 R/1000担保的追踪机制。

. As part of its field return parts analysis, the supplier includes the number of parts and

root cause analysis, where possible

若可能，市场退货件分析，包括零件号和根本原因分析。

. Supplier has a procedure for short-term and long-term customer satisfaction and is

compliant.

供方有短期和长期顾客满意度程序并遵照执行。

Note:

Customer satisfaction information can be obtained through JD Power or OEM

注：顾客满意度信息可以通过

JD

发动机或

OEM

获得。

. Supplier understands and utilizes the High Mileage Reliability process in developing

products for Ford.

供方理解和应用高层可靠性过程开发FORD 的产品。

. Supplier analyzes low- and high-time in service as part of its continuous improvement

project selection process.

供方分析高，低里程服务来选择作为持续改进的一部分。

INC

I.2. FMEAs/Control Plans

I.2.1

X

All Ford parts have documented design and process failure mode and effects analysis (DFMEA,

. Supplier has documented process for developing and continuously improving

Rate this

PFMEA), and Control Plans (or DCPs). There is a robust process in place for developing these

DFMEAs, PFMEAs, and control plans for all Ford parts.

sub-

documents.

供方有一个文件化过程和开发持续改进Ford所有零件的DFMEAs, PFMEAs 和控制计划

element by

所有 Ford 零件有文件化得(DFMEA, PFMEA), 控制计划或（CP），有一个稳健的过程来开发这

。

entering

些文件。

. Supplier obtains and reviews system and design FMEA or Design Verification Plan &

r, y, or g inReport (DVP&R) from a System and/or Design & Release Engineer to ensure that

cell above"effective and credible" PFMEA/Control Plan/work instructions can be developed and

implemented.

供方从系统或设计和发布过程获得并评审DFMEA OR DVP＆R以保证开发有效的

PFMEA/控制计划/作业指导并实施。

4 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

All Ford parts have documented design and process failure mode and effects analysis (DFMEA,

Comments /

Action Plan纠

Rate this

&

素

望

PFMEA), and Control Plans (or DCPs). There is a robust process in place for developing these

Evidence 注释/

正措施

sub-

要

documents.

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

子

t

a

element by

所有 Ford 零件有文件化得(DFMEA, PFMEA),

Expectation

控制计划或（

期望

CP），有一个稳健的过程来开发这

AllResponsibility

i

l

i

e

t

b

D

entering

&

i

g

a

限

n

t

些文件。

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

n

n

n

D

限

o

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

i

n

期

r, y, or g in

o

e

t

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

i

o

任

t

i

e

e

t

m

a

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

R

p

u

期

l

成

cell above

a

e

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

责

D

p

t

m

/

c

l

e

完

e

e

shall haverated

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

x

b

E

u

documentedExpectations)

C

是/。

S

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

. Supplier uses a process flow diagram or surrogate control plan when developing a

PFMEA / DFMEA.

供方当开发PFMEA/DFMEA时应用过程流程式控制计划代替品。

.Supplier incorporates all permanent corrective actions from 8Ds into the FMEAs and

Control Plans.

供方实施8D内的永久措施并反馈到FMEAS和空寂计划中。

. Supplier reviews DFMEAs / PFMEAs, identifies "potential cause of failure," and

implements error-proofing, where applicable.

供方评审 DFMEAs / PFMEAs识别潜在失效原因，可能时实施防措。.

Note: Refer to the Ford FMEA Handbook to ensure that all requirements are met,

available on FSP, Library Services (/wps/public/fsp/)

注：参考FPRD FMEA手册，保证满足所有要求，FSP，图书服务能获得 HTTPS。

Note:

If the supplier-led APQP team does not have system/design FMEA and/or DVP&R,

then the element in the APQP tracking document "MUST" be identified as "RED" and

all related documents, such as PFMEA/Control plan, should be identified as "Yellow".

注：若供方

APQP

团队没有系统

/DFMEA

或

DVP

＆

R

，那么

APQP

追踪文件内要素，

必须识别为

“

红色

”

，与之相关的文件，如

FMEA/

控制，应识别为

“

黄色

”

。

I.2.2

X

FMEAs are reviewed annually or as issues arise. A Pareto is used to focus on 1) severity, 2) the

. Supplier understands how to develop a robust FMEA (i.e., understands the process

Rate this

product of severity and occurrence, and 3) to identify high RPNs in order to prioritize actions to

function, failure mode at that function, its effects and causal factors, and detection

sub-

drive improvements.

methods).

element by

FMEAs 每年评审或呈现问题时，柏拉图应用于关注1）S，2）SXO 3）高RPN值并驱动优先改

All failure modes that have led to rework operations are included in FMEAs, including

entering

进。

actions to eliminate the failure modes and therefore to eliminate the need for future

r, y, or g inrework.

cell above

供方理解如何开发稳健的FMEA（理解过程功能），功能失效模式影响和原因因素和探

测方法）。

导致返工的所有失效模式或在FMEA 包括涵盖消除失效模式的措施和消除将来返工的需

求。

. Supplier develops recommended actions to eliminate potential failure modes based on

the following priority:

1) highest severity items

2) highest criticality ( Severity x Occurrence )

3) highest RPN ( Severity x Occurrence x Detection )

Actions are recorded and when completed, the Revised Severity, Occurrence and

Detection columns are completed, even if the values did not change.

消除潜在模式供方采取推荐措施，基于以下优先顺序

1）高S项目

2)高关键特性项目(SXO)

3)高RPN(S*X*O)

当措施完成时，S,O,D列需完成，即使他们的值没有变化。

. Supplier reviews performance data to validate the ratings.

供方评审数据绩效来验证分值。

w Supplier understands what quality tools, such as, cause & effect (C&E) diagrams

(based on process dominance such as "set up", "machine", "fixture/pallet", "tooling",

etc.), P-diagram, DOE, Value chain mapping etc., were used and how analytical data

was developed and used to develop DFMEA (for Design Responsible Supplier) and

PFMEA.

供方理解应用何种质量工具，如何进行数据分析并应用区开发FMEA（有设计责任的供

方）和PFMEA，例如原因＆影响图（过程为基础如：“架模”“加工”“治具/托盘”等。）P

图，DOE，价值链图等。

w Supplier has a process to track FMEA revisions. Revision levels are included on

FMEAs.

供方有追踪

w Supplier uses the Ford FMEA Handbook available through FSP Library Services.

FMEA修订的过程，FMEAS包含修订等级。

供方通过 FSP图书服务获取FORD FMEA 手册。

Note:

Specifying severity and occurrence ratings for SCs is equivalent to establishing RPN

thresholds. Rankings are subjective and therefore cannot often be compared

between parts. Let the highest severity & criticality drive SC selection.

注：规定

SCS

的

SXO

的分值等于建立

RPN

的极限，等级是主观，因此不能时常在零

件之间比值，让高

SXO

来驱动

SC

的选择。

5 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

e

期

子

证据

(Action Plan,

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

AllResponsibility

b

D

t

i

g

Expectation期望

a

限

n

t

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

D

限

o

n

n

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

n

n

任

o

i

期

i

e

t

o

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

t

p

a

责

e

u

期

l

成

t

D

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

p

e

m

完

/

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

shall haverated

C

x

b

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

Note: Per the Ford FMEA Handbook,

> RPN is a value between 1 to 1000. There is no threshold value above which an

action must be taken or below which we are excused from considering an action

>Severity: Rankings of "9" or "10" are restricted to safety or government regulated.

>Occurrence: The criterion for ranking Occurrence "1" is the probability of failure is

remote: failure is unlikely.

>Detection: The criterion for ranking "1" is that detection is almost certain.

I.2.3

X

All error detection areas are reviewed and, where feasible, plans exist to move to error prevention

. Supplier has a process to move from detection to prevention. Action plans exist

Rate this

devices (e.g., poke yoke).

showing responsibility and timing.

sub-

所有探测区域被评审者可行，有设备预防错误计划（如防措）。

供方有一个从探测到预防的过程，措施计划显示责任者和时程。

element by

entering

. Supplier understands where there are opportunities for poke-yoke.

r, y, or g in

供方理解何处有防措的机会。

cell above

. Supplier shows evidence that the error-proofing methods used are effective.

供方有证据显示防措方法是有效的。

. Supplier understands how to correlate prevention to CCs, SCs and HICs (where

applicable) to determine effectiveness of the method (i.e., can address the causal factor

(failure mode)).

供方理解如何经CCS,SCS,和HICS与预防联系去确定方法的有效性（如叙述因果关系，

失效模式).

. Supplier can directly relate the detection method to the cause of failure.

供方能将失效原因与探测方法直接联系起来。

Note:

Poke-yoke helps in detection and should be derived from FMEA. Poke Yoke is

the practice of making defects impossible to create, so it is a prevention

method, not a detection method. Poke-Yokes should be physically tested on

the shop floor to ensure they work. Detection methods are measurement

systems and should be included in the control plan and have regularly

scheduled gauge R&Rs performed.

注：

防措有助探测并在

FMEA

中体现，防措是使失效不可能发生，故它是一种预防方法，

而不是一种探测方法，防措应在现场进行物理测试以保证有效工作，探测方法是测量

系统应被包含在控制计划中，并定期执行

GR

﹠

R.

I.2.4

X

Suppliers, in cooperation with its customers, have identified Critical Characteristics (CCs),

. The YCs and YSs (Potential Critical and Significant Characteristics) are defined on the

Rate this

Significant Characteristics (SCs) and High Impact Characteristics (HICs - where applicable) on

DFMEA

sub-

their PFMEAs and Control Plans for every Ford part or family of Ford parts.

element by

供方与顾客一起识别FORD每个零件或系列零件并在PFMEAS和PCS体现，CCS和HLCS（若适

Per the Ford procedure on selection of critical and significant characteristics, CCs for

entering

用）。

the part should include, as a minimum, the CCs listed in the Ford Critical

r, y, or g in

Characteristics Database for that system or component. Any deviations from this list

cell above

have been approved by the responsible lead Ford Chief Functional Engineer.

按FORD程序选择关键特性和重要特性，零件的CCS应至少包含在FORD的零件或整个

系统的CCS数据中，任何与清单偏离的须由 FORD功能工程师主管批准。

Note:

CCs, SCs and HICs are not necessarily restricted to part characteristics. Process

parameters are equally critical to the parts characteristics. The process parameters

must also be identified as CCs, SCs and HICs and must be monitored and managed

through the control plan.

注：

CCS,SCS

和

HICS

不须限制于零件特性，过程参数等同于零件特性过程参数必须也作为

CCS,SCS

和

HICS

识别并通过控制计划被监控和管理。

Note:

Critical Characteristics "CC" or inverted delta can be identified by suppliers or by

Ford, but can only be approved by Ford's Design and Release activity and must be

identified on the Ford drawing and/or engineering specification.

注：

供方或

FORD

识别的关键特性

“CC"

或

”

被转化的△

“

，仅能被

FORD

设计和发布组批

准，并必须在图纸或

/

和工程规范中识别。

I.2.5

Supplier works with Ford (e.g., Program Vehicle Teams (PVT), Program Engineering Office

(PEO), Component Review Teams (CRT), Supplier Technical Assistance (STA)) to establish

final agreement of SCs and HICs. Suppliers obtain specific agreement from Ford for any parts

not having SCs or HICs.

供方与FORD（如发动机组IPVT）项目工程办公室(PEO)零件评审小组（CRT)供方技术支持

（STA)一起建立最终一致的SCS个HICS任何没有SCS或HICS的零件供应商从FORD得到特效协

议。

6 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

AllResponsibility

t

a

i

l

i

b

e

D

&

t

i

g

Expectation期望

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

a

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

t

n

n

任

D

限

o

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

regardless ofRequired for all

i

o

n

t

期

i

e

a

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

(*Denotes Focus Area)

o

t

p

责

e

u

期

l

成

a

m

R

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

m

完

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

I.2.5

evidence

所有黄色和红

X

Supplier works with Ford (e.g., Program Vehicle Teams (PVT), Program Engineering Office

listed,

色期望要求由

. Supplier determines potential CCs, SCs and HICs (where applicable) from the

Rate this

(PEO), Component Review Teams (CRT), Supplier Technical Assistance (STA)) to establish

system/design FMEA with additional characteristics identified by the PFMEA cross-

sub-

final agreement of SCs and HICs. Suppliers obtain specific agreement from Ford for any parts

functional team.

element by

not having SCs or HICs.

供方由PFMEA跨功能小组从系统/DFMEA识别的附加特性确定潜在的CCS,SCS和

entering

供方与FORD（如发动机组IPVT）项目工程办公室(PEO)零件评审小组（CRT)供方技术支持

（STA)一起建立最终一致的SCS个HICS任何没有SCS或HICS的零件供应商从FORD得到特效协

H2CS(若适用）。

r, y, or g in

cell above

议。

Note:

For SCs and HICs (where applicable), severity rankings are between 5-8, with

Occurrence rankings between product/process characteristics identified as

SC, HIC and CC in the PFMEA must also be identified in the control plan/work

instructions. Additionally, rankings for CC (inverted delta) and OS (operator safety) are

severity = 9 or 10, with Occurrence rankings between 1-10.

注：

I.2.6

X

Supplier ensures that all print dimensions and call-out notes on the engineering drawing are

. All other dimensions not specified in the control plan have a frequency of inspection

Rate this

always met through control plans, work instructions, job set-up instructions, and receiving

identified in the layout report and in the quality procedure manual. (Annual lay-out can

sub-

inspection.

be considered)

element by

供方保证工程图纸上所尺寸和注释通过控制计划能满足，作业指导书，换模指导书和进料检验指

entering导书。. Ensure that all product specifications (e.g. dimensions, GD&T tolerances,

r, y, or g inperformance) are met by use of strategies which include the Control Plan.

cell above

. Ensure that control methods and frequencies specified are appropriate for each

characteristic, for example, as listed in the Ford customer specifics to ISO/TS 16949,

Table "A", "Qualification of All Product Characteristics"

注：所有其他在控制计划中没有规定的尺寸，在全尺寸包噶耦合质量程序手册（年度全

尺寸中考虑）识别检验频次。

应用控制计划的策略保证所有产品规范被满足（如尺寸，GD﹠T公差，绩效）。

保证每一个特性的控制方法和规定的频次是适宜的，例如FORD顾客规范，

ISO/TS16949,表A，所有产品特性资质。

. All process or product characteristics being used to manage the manufacturing

process are identified on the control plan

所有过程或产品特性在控制计划中被识别，并在制造过程中被管控。

. There is evidence that full dimensional validation (lay-outs) is completed annually.

Note: Actual measurement results are available.

年度全尺寸被完成由数据显示。

注：可获得实际的测量结果。

. There is operator-based, statistical process control evidence that supports sample

frequency for all print dimensions whether or not they are identified on the control plan.

无论是否在控制计划中有所有图面尺寸的抽样频次，有证据支持，以操作员为基础的过

程统计。

7 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

inspection.

sub-

element by

供方保证工程图纸上所尺寸和注释通过控制计划能满足，作业指导书，换模指导书和进料检验指

entering导书。

r, y, or g in

cell above

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

子

y

t

AllResponsibility

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

Expectations,and Due Date

b

D

i

g

Expectation期望

人

t

a

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

t

s

D

限

o

n

n

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

n

i

e

t

任

o

i

期

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

o

t

p

a

责

e

u

期

l

成

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

e

e

R

m

完

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

. Process parameters that affect the Critical to Quality characteristics of a part are

identified and controlled.

. Process Parameters critical to quality should be identified on the control plan with their

upper and lower control limits.

影响零件关键质量特性的过程参数被识别并管理。

影响质量的关键过程参数应在控制计划中被识别，并有上下控制限。

w Supplier is compliant to Vehicle Parts Branding Directive E-108 for any new tooled

parts after 8/1/2002.

供方遵循汽车零件商标指示

Note:

E-108，2002/8/1以后开模的零件.

E-108 Parts Branding Directive can be found on the Ford Supplier Portal (FSP) at:

注：汽车零件商标指示

E-108

可在

FORD

供方入口获得

https:.

I.2.7

X

Where use of pass-through characteristics is specified, supplier verifies pass-through

. Supplier has specific controls in place that are robust in preventing and containing non-

Rate this

characteristics and ensures that zero defects are at Vehicle Operations (VO) and final customer.

conformances.

sub-

当通过特性被规定，供方验证通过特性并保证在车辆操作和最终顾客处事零缺陷。

供方有稳健管理去预防和不合格。

element by

entering

. Where required, pass-through characteristics have been identified for all new parts and

r, y, or g in

existing parts. Where required, these pass-through characteristics are identified on the

cell above

PFMEA and control plan. (The intent is to implement robust controls within the process

control plans / work instructions to manage pass-through characteristics.)

当有要求时，所有新零件和已有零件要被识别通过特性并在PFMEA和控制计划中体现。

（意在稳健地通过过程控制计划/作业指导书管理通过特性）。

. Where required, supplier has a process for identifying and managing pass-through

characteristics with sub-suppliers. Where required, this process includes obtaining data

from sub-suppliers to ensure that pass-through characteristics are monitored and

compliant.

当有要求时，供方与分供方一起识别和管理通过特性，当有要求时，这个过程包含从分

供方获得数据以保证通过特性，被监控和遵从。

. Where required, pass-through characteristics are evaluated jointly between Ford's

manufacturing engineering, product engineer, STA, and the supplier during the

development of PFMEA/Control Plan. (The intent of this process is to identify those

characteristics that could have significant impact on customer satisfaction and warranty

and may not have been identified as SCs, CCs.)

当有要求时，FORD制造工程师，产品工程师，STA和供方通过开发PFMEA/控制计划一

期评价，通过特性（这个过程意图识别那么严重影响顾客满意和担保的那些特性且可能

没有被识别为SCS,CCS）。

. Where required, supplier reviews error-proofing methods for all pass-through

characteristics. Action plans are in place to implement error-proofing methods, where

required.

当有要求时，供方评方所有通过特性的防措方法，当有要求时，有措施计划执行防措方

法。

Note:

Pass-Through Characteristics (PTC) are defined as: Product Characteristics that are

supplied to receiving Ford Plants by an outside supplier or by an internal (Ford)

supplier that are not controlled by subsequent processing of the using plant. Defective

PTCs may affect Vehicle Operations or the buying public. Use of pass through

characteristics is typically required by Powertrain.

注：

通过特性定义：由外部供方或（

FORD)

内部供方提供给

FORD

工厂的产品特性，不需

由工厂下一过程管控，通过特性可能影响车辆操作或公共买房，通过特性是发动机厂典

型的要求。

I.2.8

X

Control Plan is a result of appropriate quality planning and includes clear linkage between

. Supplier can demonstrate linkage between DFMEA, PFMEA, Control Plan, Work

Rate this

DFMEA and PFMEA.

Instructions, etc.

sub-

控制计划是质量策划的结果，与DFMEA和PFMEA是相连接的。

供方能证实DFMEA,PFMEA，控制计划，作业指导书等是相互链接的。

element by

entering

r, y, or g in

cell above

I.2.9

X

Control Plans contain the following elements:

. Control Plans / Work Instructions are readily available.

Rate this

控制计划包括以下要素：

控制计划/作业指导书可获得。

sub-

element by

entering

r, y, or g in

cell above

8 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Supplier Contact E

供方联络

E-Mail:

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

现场工程师姓名

:

STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Name

名字

:

Comments /

Evidence 注释/

证据

All

Expectations,

regardless of

Color Rating,

shall have

Commodities

商品

:

Action Plan纠

正措施

(Action Plan,

Responsibility

and Due Date

Required for all

yellow and red

rated

e

c

t

a

t

i

o

n

&

期

望

&

e

l

e

m

e

n

t

子

要

素

R

a

t

i

n

g

Expectation期望

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

(*Denotes Focus Area)

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

o

m

p

l

e

t

i

o

n

D

a

t

e

完

成

期

限

R

e

s

p

o

n

s

i

b

i

l

i

t

y

责

任

人

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

/

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

D

u

e

D

a

t

e

期

限

Contact: (siminfo@)

p

-

x

b

E

u

Control Plans contain the following elements:

Rate this

S

documentedExpectations)

控制计划包括以下要素：evidence

所有黄色和红

sub-

listed,

色期望要求由

element by

entering

r, y, or g in

cell above

-- Operation number / name工序序号/名称

-- Part Name / Part Number零件名称/零件序号

-- Inspection Requirements 检查要求

-- Specifications规格

-- Control Methods控制方法

-- SC, CC, HIC (where applicable), and Engineering Specifications (ES)

requirements are identified and appropriate

SC, CC, HIC (适用时)，ES要求已识别且适当的。

-- SC, CC, HIC (where applicable), and ES Control methods (in-process checks, process

gauging, and part gauging) are appropriate.

SC, CC, HIC （通用时） ES控制方法是适当的（过程检查，过程检具，零件检具）

-- Error proofing methods

防措方法

-- In-process control methods

过程控制方法

9 of 30

C

是/。

Note:

Additional information on Control Plans can be found in the AIAG Advanced Product

Quality Planning and Control Plan Reference manual at /

注：

AIAG,APQP

可获得控制计划附加信息，控制计划，参考手册在

/

可

获得。

. Control plans identify the latest part level (suffix)

控制计划识别零件最新水平（后缀）。

. Product and process CTQ specifications are included in the control plan

产品和过程CTQ的规范在控制计划中识别。

. Control methods are specified in the PFMEA/control plan/work instructions and are

appropriate for the type of process.

. Work instructions clearly define quality acceptance criteria

PFMEA,控制计划/作业指导书中规定控制方法，且过程类型是适当的。

Note:

Operations may be controlled by, but not limited to, Statistical Process Control,

inspection, attribute data, error-proofing (automated or non-automated), sampling

plans, visual aids, operator instructions, SPC charting, gauging, auto-compensators,

etc.

注：

工序可以由以下方法控制，但不限于此，统计过程控制，检查属性数据，防措方法（自

动或非自动），样品计划，可规划辅具，作业指导书，

SPC

图，检具，自动补偿等。

. A cross-functional team is formed (including customer) to identify SCs, CCs, HICs

(where applicable), and ES

组成跨功能小组识别SCS,CCS,HICS(适用时）和ES(包括顾客）。

. SC, CC, HIC (where applicable) and ES control methods are agreed by the

Component Review Team (CRT) (CCs are approved by Ford only)

SC, CC, HIC （适用时）ES控制方法由零件评审小组(CPT)同意（CCS仅由FORD批

准）。

. All CCs, SCs, and HICs (where applicable) from the PFMEA have been identified on

control plans.

所有识别FMEA中 CCs, SCs, 和 HICs（适用时）在控制计划中体现。

. Engineering Specifications (ES) are identified by ES No. on control plans.

工程规范在控制计划用ES序号体现。

. Variable data is being collected by the equipment operators, where appropriate.

适当时，由设备操作者收集变化数据。

. Listed process parameters and part characteristics are being controlled using the

method identified in the control plan/work instructions.

控制计划/作业指导书列出的过程参数和零件特性用已识别的方法进行管理。

. Gauging method is appropriate for the task and was specified during the APQP

process.

APQP过程中检具方法是适当的且列明。

. Error proofing methods that are in place cannot be circumvented by the operator and

that poke yoke is on the plant's certification program.

防措方法不能被作业员智取且防措是工厂的认证项目。

. Operator understands the reason for the error proofing method.

作业员理解防措方法的理由。

. Error-proofing methods are tested for effectiveness.

防措方法经测试有效.

. Process maps, Kaizan documents, include (1) Load Balancing, (2) Poke Yoke, (3)

Pull/Flow Systems, (4) Small Batch Sizes, (5) Event Minutes, (6) Kaizan Process

Documents, (7) Kaizan Schedules, (8) Kaizan Resources.

过程里程，改善文件包括（1）负荷平衡（2）防措（3）拉动/流动系统（4）小批量

（5）事件记录（6）改善过程文件（7）改善时间（8）改善资源。

. Control methods (i.e., in-process gauging, poke yoke, visual inspection, etc.) are

identified on the control plan as specified in the PFMEA and included in the operator's

standard of work. Control methods are modified as required.

当在FMEA中规定时管理方法（例如过程检具，防措，可视检查等，在控制计划中识别

包括标准作业，控制计划，当要求时，需修订。

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Supplier Contact E

供方联络

E-Mail:

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

现场工程师姓名

:

STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Name

名字

:

Comments /

Evidence 注释/

证据

All

Expectations,

regardless of

Color Rating,

shall have

Commodities

商品

:

Action Plan纠

正措施

(Action Plan,

Responsibility

and Due Date

Required for all

yellow and red

rated

e

c

t

a

t

i

o

n

&

期

望

&

e

l

e

m

e

n

t

子

要

素

R

a

t

i

n

g

Expectation期望

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

(*Denotes Focus Area)

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

o

m

p

l

e

t

i

o

n

D

a

t

e

完

成

期

限

R

e

s

p

o

n

s

i

b

i

l

i

t

y

责

任

人

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

/

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

D

u

e

D

a

t

e

期

限

Contact: (siminfo@)

p

-

x

b

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

-- Sample Size and frequency

listed,

色期望要求由

样品大小和频次

-- Required tools, gauges, and other equipment

工具，检具和其他设备要求。

-- Reaction plans must clearly direct the operator on how to act when a process begins to go

out of control, or a product fails an inspection or test.

当过程开始失控时或产品检查或测试失效直接作业员如何处理的反应计划必须清晰。

10 of 30

C

是/。

. Sampling plans are statistically valid (based on quantity and variation) and justify

probability of occurrence for a given cause or failure mode.

样品计划是统计有效的（基于数量和变量），给出的原因或失效模式证明发生的可能性

。

. Required tools, gauges, and other equipments are identified for sub-suppliers.

分供方的工具，检具和其它设备要求被识别。

. Reaction strategies (i.e. part containment, supervisor notification, line shut-down, etc.)

are specified for out of control conditions.

失控的反应策略被规定（如零件围堵，监督人通知，停线等。）

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

AllResponsibility

t

a

i

l

i

b

e

D

&

t

i

g

Expectation期望

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

a

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

t

n

n

D

限

o

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

regardless ofRequired for all

i

o

n

t

o

任

t

期

i

e

a

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

(*Denotes Focus Area)

p

责

e

u

期

l

成

a

m

R

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

m

完

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

x

是/。

E

u

S

out of control, or a product fails an inspection or test.

documentedExpectations)

C

当过程开始失控时或产品检查或测试失效直接作业员如何处理的反应计划必须清晰。

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

. Operator(s) understand the conditions for an "Out of Control" state.

作业员理解失控条件的陈述。

. Reaction plans are adhered to (i.e. can provide when, why and what was done when

an operation went down thru downtime sheets, end of line metrics, etc.)

反应计划被实施（如当一个工序中断通过停机记录，末端指标能提供何时，为什么和做

了什么）。

. Roles and responsibilities for all production and production support personnel are in

place to support direct labor personnel, and have specific responsibilities and approval

requirements if reacting to out-of-standard conditions.

当失控反应时，所有生产和支持生产的人员的角色和职责去支持直接生产人员，有特定

的职责和批准的要求。

INC

I.3. Employee Readiness/Training Review

I.3.1

X

Supplier is responsible for assessing the skills required to perform all activities that affect product

. Supplier has a selection criteria process to assign skilled operators to a given

Rate this

quality.

function.

sub-

供方评价执行影响产品质量所有活动的技能。

供方有分配给定功能的技能作业员的选择准则过程。

element by

entering

. There is evidence of skills management procedure.

有技能管理程序的证据。

r, y, or g in

cell above

. Supplier manages its training to compensate for turnover rate.

供方有补偿理智的培训。

. There is a process to manage absenteeism, especially for a given critical

manufacturing process (which is based on severity and occurrence).

供方管理缺勤率，尤其是关键制造过程（基于严重的频度）。

. Supplier identifies operator skill set and training requirements.

供方识别作业员技能和培训需求。

. As part of the APQP process, employee staffing, skill requirements, and training are

identified, and support program timing.

作为APQP的一部分，员工，技能需求，培训被识别并支持项目进度。

I.3.2

X

Employees have a skills assessment, training plan, and evidence of training.

. Supplier has a training program and can demonstrate compliance to training plans.

Rate this

供方有技能评价，培训计划的培训证据。

供方有培训项目并能证实遵循培训计划。

sub-

element by

. Training is part of the supplier corporate objectives

entering

培训是供方的一部分。

r, y, or g in

cell above

. There is a process to determine training needs. "On the Job" training recorded

and managed

有一个过程确定培训需求，“在职培训”记录和管理。

. There is a planned training program for each employee (hourly and salary).

每位员工（小时工和薪水工）的培训计划项目。

. There is a process in place to address a high turnover rate condition

有一个过程解决高离职率的问题。

. Operator qualifications/training records are readily available to the production

supervisor

生产主管能获得作业员的培训记录和资质。

.Training records of key salaried personnel (i.e., QC manager, Incoming Receiving

managers, etc.) are reviewed regularly for compliance.

关键人员（如QC经理，进料经理等）的培训记录定期评审以确保符合。

. Supplier conducts training on appropriate labor conditions including health and safety

for all employees on a regular basis.

供方定期执行所有雇员适当的劳动条件培训包括健康和安全。

I.3.3

X

Supplier ensures that only trained and qualified personnel are involved in all aspects of the

. Operators understand the application of the component they are producing.

Rate this

manufacturing of Ford Parts, including rework operations.

作业员理解生产的零件用途。

sub-

供方确保有培训有资质的人员从事FORD零件所有生产的活动，包括返工作业。

Operators understand what is critical in the component and what could happen

element by

(consequence of failure mode) if it does not meet specification

entering

作业员理解零件关键是什么，一旦不满足规范会发生什么（失效模式的后果）。

r, y, or g in

cell above

Operators are/were part of work instruction development process

作业员时开发作业指导书的一部分。

11 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

AllResponsibility

t

a

i

Supplier ensures that only trained and qualified personnel are involved in all aspects of the

l

Rate this

i

&

b

e

t

i

g

manufacturing of Ford Parts, including rework operations.

Expectation期望

D

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

a

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

sub-

t

o

n

n

i

n

D

限

o

任

i

e

t

供方确保有培训有资质的人员从事

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

FORD

o

i

t

期

element by

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

零件所有生产的活动，包括返工作业。

regardless ofRequired for all

p

责

e

u

期

l

成

a

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

p

e

entering

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

e

m

完

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

r, y, or g in

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

是/。

cell above

x

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

Operators are/were trained prior to performing the job

作业员上岗前培训。

. There is a defined process where operators have the opportunity to provide feedback

(related to the process and/or job) to their supervisor/manager.

有一个过程去让作业员向他们的主管/经理反馈（涉及过程或工作）。

INC

I.4. APQP/Launch/PPAP/Run-at-Rate Review

I.4.1

X

Supplier has an APQP tracking mechanism in place.

. Supplier management reviews, at a minimum, the Ford APQP manufacturing elements

Rate this

供方有APQP追踪机制。

to ensure proper tracking, documentation, and action plans.

sub-

供方至少要进行FORD APQP生产要素管理评审，以确保适当追踪，文件和措施计划。

element by

entering

r, y, or g in

. All new Ford programs are being tracked according to the Ford APQP Reporting

cell above

Guidelines.

所有的新FORS项目依FORD报告指南进行追踪。

. Action plans are developed to improve any yellow or red APQP elements.

APQP的所有要素或黄项目有措施计划。

Note: Refer to the APQP reference manual to ensure that all requirements are met:

注：参考APQP参考手册，以保证满足所有要求。

/sta/

I.4.2

X

Supplier has a system to manage new vehicle program launches.

. Supplier's Program Management Team is separate from the Product Development

Rate this

供方有管理新的车辆量产项目的系统。

team, and both are accountable to senior management.

sub-

供方项目管理团队来源非产品开发部门，二者均对高层管理负责。

element by

entering

. Supplier's Program Management Team has dedicated resources to support the

r, y, or g in

program, including key sub-suppliers.

cell above

供方项目管理团队决定项目所需的资源，包括关键供方。

. Program Management Team includes personnel from the supplier's manufacturing

plant.

项目管理团队包括供方制造工人的人员。

. Supplier's new programs are tracked and monitored based off of Ford's PD

milestones.

供方基于FORD的产品开发过程，追踪和监控新的项目。

. Supplier has the required CAD/CAM systems to interface with Ford, and that capability

is at the supplier's manufacturing site, where possible. If not possible, supplier can

demonstrate that its system utilizes ongoing product development activities that impact

the manufacturing site's tooling and processing, and that documentation is maintained

at the appropriate customer levels.

供方有CAD/CAM系统与FORD界面相连，可能的话，早供方制造现场需有能力，若不可

能的话，供方证实应用的系统能开发影响制造现场的工装和过程并保持适当的顾客水平

的文件记录。

. Supplier's PD system is a formalized process that prevents verbal-only design direction.

供方产品开发系统是一个正式的过程以预防仅是口头的设计指导。

. Supplier uses established Ford/Supplier links to communicate most current program

status or potential issues impacting its ability to meet program expectations. The links

include, but are not limited to, Program Module Team (PMT) Meetings, APQP Status

Reports, Launch Readiness Review (LRR) Status Reports, and regular e-mail

communication to the customer.

供方建立FORD与供方沟通平台，以便沟通当前项目状态或影响满足项目期望的能力的

潜在文艺。此链接包括当不局限于，项目团队会议，APQP状态，报告，量产准备评审

（LRR)。

. Supplier is active on the PMTs and participates in all program reviews involving the

supplier.

供方积极参与所有项目评审。

. Milestone reviews are scheduled and conducted to communicate launch status, open

issues, and issue closure status to supplier's senior management.

过程评审在计划内并量产状态，问题点，关闭状态向供方高层管理沟通。

. There is a defined plan to communicate program status to supplier's manufacturing

plant.

项目状态沟通到-----供方制造的计划。

12 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

AllResponsibility

t

a

i

l

i

b

e

D

&

t

i

g

Expectation期望

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

a

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

t

n

n

任

D

限

o

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

regardless ofRequired for all

i

o

n

t

期

i

e

a

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

(*Denotes Focus Area)

o

t

p

责

e

u

期

l

成

a

m

R

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

m

完

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

. Supplier understands its design-responsible supplier deliverables and has a system in

place to execute them.

供方理解他们的设计职责并有执行的系统。

. Supplier has the capability for design, manufacture, adjustment and maintenance of

dies/molds, jigs, tooling and fixtures that are used in all phases of production. If these

activities are outsourced, the supplier has the appropriate level of control and resource

for managing toolmakers (quality, timing etc.).

供方有生产所有阶段的模模型，夹具，工具和治具的设计，生产，修改和维护的能力，

若这些活动外包，供方要有适应的管理等级和资源，管理工装制造商（质量，时程等）

。

. Supplier uses Robust Design Principles and customer-approved Design/Testing Lab.

供方应用稳健的设计原理和顾客批准的设计/测量实验室。

. Supplier uses a LRR process to track and assess its sub-suppliers.

供方应用LRR追踪和评价分供方。

I.4.3

X

Supplier has a process in place to support Ford prototype and pre-production build events in a

. Supplier develops pre-production and prototype parts that simulate its production

Rate this

timely manner.

process.

sub-

供方有一个过程支持Ford样件和生产的时程节点。

供方开始试生产和样件来模拟生产过程。

element by

entering

. Supplier verifies that all prototype parts meet engineering, dimensional, and functional

r, y, or g in

requirements.

cell above

供方验证所有满足样样满足工程，尺寸和功能要求。

. Supplier requires and utilizes Prototype Control Plans.

供方要求和应用样件控制计划。

. Supplier reviews and signs off sub-supplier inspection results prior to CP Build.

供方评审和签署分供方检查结果优先于控制计划制定。

. Supplier has dedicated resources to support all prototype builds on site at Ford, and an

agreed structure for managing issues.

供方决定支持Ford现场所有样件制作的资源，和管理问题的一致组织。

. Supplier understands the RED Border Process and is operating within the guidelines

供方理解红色效果过程和正在运作的指南。

. Supplier supports all vehicle walk-around, AIMS, shortage, and change control

meetings.

供方支持所有车辆评估结果，自动问题矩阵系统，缺料和变更管理会议。

. Supplier has dedicated Ford Assembly Plant and Vehicle Engineering resources

available to support launch.

供方确保Ford装配工厂和车辆工程资源，以支持量产。

. Supplier launch support personnel are technically capable to work on any launch

issue.

供方量产支持人员对任何量产问题有技术能力解决。

. Supplier on-site launch support personnel provide timely responses to all launch-

related issues or requirements.

供方现场量产支持人员针对量产相关的所有问题或要求提供及时的反应。

. Supplier launch representatives are empowered to take immediate action on issues

requiring fast turn-around by the launch team.

供方量产代表有权针对问题要求来采取措施，以便量产团队快速回复正常生产。

. Supplier launch representatives are available for around-the-clock access.

供方量产代表每天24小时内可获得。

.Supplier addresses launch readiness issues with Ford by defining an owner and action

within 24 hours, and drives closure of the issues in an agreed-upon timely manner.

供方在24小时内针对Ford量产准备问题点提出责任者和措施，以驱动即时关闭问题点。

I.4.4

X

Supplier has a process to continuously monitor and improve launch performance.

. Supplier has a system that tracks performance to meet PSW dates.

Rate this

供方有一个过程持续监控和改进生产绩效。

供方有绩效追踪系统以满足PSW日期。

sub-

element by

. Supplier manages sub-suppliers to assure PSW timing is met.

entering

供方管理分供方以保证满足PSW时程。

r, y, or g in

. Supplier has a process to notify its customers, including buyers, of any slips to PSW

cell above

timing.

供方有一个过程通知顾客，包括买方，当有任何一个PSW时程延误。

13 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

子

y

t

t

a

i

Supplier has a process to continuously monitor and improve launch performance.

l

i

e

&

Rate this

AllResponsibility

b

D

i

g

供方有一个过程持续监控和改进生产绩效。

Expectation期望

人

t

a

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

Expectations,and Due Date

s

o

sub-

t

n

n

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

n

任

D

限

o

i

t

期

i

e

t

o

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

p

a

责

e

element by

u

期

l

成

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

p

e

entering

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

e

m

完

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

r, y, or g in

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

cell above

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

. Supplier has a system in place that responds to all Ford Consumer Product Audit

(FCPA) issues, where applicable.

适用时，供方有系统针对FORD消费者产品审核的问题做出反应。

. Supplier has a process to contain and resolve all FCPA issues prior to the next build.

在下一个阶段之前，供方有一过程去遏制和解决所有FCPA的问题点。

Supplier validates all FCPA fixes with the customer prior closing any AIMS issue.

供方与顾客在任何自动问题矩阵系统问题关闭之前，验证FCPA的问题。

. Supplier has a formal system to conduct operator-based Quality Stand Downs on all

new product or process launches.

供方有一个正式的系统对所有新产品或量产过程，以作业员为基础去执行质量退出。

. Supplier drives the operator-based Quality Stand Down process to its supply base.

供方驱动它的外包商以作业员为基础执行质量退出。

. Supplier incorporates Quality Stand Down information into the PFMEAS and Control

Plans.

供方将质量退出的信息反馈到PFMEA和控制计划。

. Supplier has a process to conduct Fresh Eye Reviews on all new products, gauges,

processes, and equipment, and utilizes its personnel from sister plants, divisional and

corporate staff, and/or customers.

供方有一个过程执行新眼光评审所有新产品，检具，过程和设备，利用姐妹厂，部门和

公司职员和/或顾客的人员。

. Fresh Eye Review findings are documented by the supplier, and action plans are

developed for all areas requiring improvement.

供方将新眼光的发现文件化，并对所有需改善的部分提出措施。

. Supplier has extraordinary launch plans in place to ensure a safe launch of its new

product.

供方有一个非凡生产计划以保证产品的安全量产。

. Supplier utilizes inspection data to validate extraordinary launch plans.

供方运用检查数据确认非凡的生产计划。

. Supplier has a process to move out of extraordinary containment plans only when it

has met specific quality expectations required by the Ford Program Launch Team (e.g.,

3000 consecutive parts with ZERO defects found at the supplier's manufacturing site or

ZERO QRs at the Ford Assembly Plant for the first 45 days post-Job#1.

供方有一个过程将从非凡的遏制计划移出，当Ford项目上线团队提出特出的质量期望

（如在供方制造现场连续3000件零缺陷或在Ford装配上Job#1.第一个45天零QRS。

I.4.5

X

All PPAP documentation must contain the information per the PPAP manual published by the

. Supplier is compliant to PPAP (AIAG) procedures

Rate this

Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) - this information must also be available for Ford

供方遵循AIAG PPAP 程序。

sub-

review. Suppliers have a process in place to comply with Global Phased PPAP.

element by

所有PPAP文件必须包含AIAG发布的PPAP手册的信息，刺信息必须在Ford评审时可获得，供方

Note: Refer to the PPAP reference manual to ensure that all requirements are met:

entering

有一个过程遵循全球阶段的PPAP。

注：参考PPAP手册，以确保所有要求被满足。

r, y, or g in

cell above

/

. PPAP documentation must be no more than one year old at the time of initial PSW

submission. Ford Powertrain plants require a copy of the PSW when parts are shipped.

PSW初始提交时，PPAP文件必须不要超过一年，Ford发动机工厂要求拷贝一份PSW，

当零件发运时。

. All PPAP submissions on record are to the latest Ford current design released print.

(Design responsible suppliers submit their designs to Ford for Ford release.)

所有PPAP提交的文件必须是依据Ford当前最新发布的图纸。（所有设计职责的供方向

Ford提交设计）。

. Supplier has a process for tracking "PPAPs with alert"

供方有一个过程跟踪有警报的PPAP .

. If an alert is required, supplier includes the alert number and description on the PSW

under "Declaration -- EXPLANATION/COMMENTS." (Under "Submission Results", the

box must be checked "NO")

若有“警报”，在声明期望/注释下，PSW上有包括“警报编号”描述。（在提交结果

的方框内必须写上否。）

14 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

Rate this

All PPAP documentation must contain the information per the PPAP manual published by the

Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) - this information must also be available for Ford

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

sub-

review. Suppliers have a process in place to comply with Global Phased PPAP.

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

element by

所有PPAP文件必须包含AIAG发布的PPAP手册的信息，刺信息必须在Ford评审时可获得，供方

entering

有一个过程遵循全球阶段的PPAP。

r, y, or g in

cell above

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

期望指南

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines

AllResponsibility

t

a

e

&

Expectation期望

i

l

i

t

Expectations,and Due Date

b

D

g

a

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

t

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

i

人

n

限

s

D

限

o

n

n

i

regardless ofRequired for all

n

任

o

i

期

i

e

t

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

(*Denotes Focus Area)

o

t

p

a

m

a

R

Color Rating,yellow and red

责

e

u

期

l

成

t

D

/

c

e

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

e

e

shall haverated

R

m

完

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

x

b

C

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

. On PSWs with "alerts", the supplier has submitted a PPAP for these parts prior to

expiration of the alert (alerts are normally for 90 days only).

Note:

If the supplier has not submitted a PPAP for parts after the alerts have expired, the

supplier is not compliant and the buyer, product engineer and the STA Resident must

be notified.

有“警报”的

PSW

，供方在必须警报期满之前交付

PPAP .(

警报一般只有

90

天）。

注：警报期满时，若供方仍没有提交

PPAP

，供方是不符合的且必须通知到买方，产品

工程师和驻厂

STA.

w Substance use restrictions conform with the Ford environmental specification WSS-

M99P9999-A1(includes IMDS materials reporting) and is included in the PPAP

submission under Appendix D, Production Part Approval - Material Test Results

Note:

Refer to FSP, Environmental for the WSS-M99P9999-A1 standard, and review

supplier evidence of material reporting. Rust inhibitors and other chemicals that may

be put on the component for part protection and/or for manufacturing may require

approval from Ford Toxicology department. Review if approvals were required and

obtained for any of the parts produced.

限制材料必须符合

Ford

环境规范

WSS-M99P9999-A1

（包括

IMDS

材质报告）并评审

材料报告的供方证据。为了防护零件

/

或制造而因增加的防锈剂和其他化学成份可以征

得

Ford

的有害物质部门批准。

若任何零件要求批准，则评审。

I.4.6

X

Suppliers require sub-suppliers to have a process in place that effectively satisfies all PPAP

. Supplier has a production part approval process for its sub-suppliers.

Rate this

requirements regardless of sub-supplier business relationship with Ford.

供方对分供方有生产件批准过程。

sub-

供方要求分供方有效的满足所有PPAP要求，不论分供方与Ford业务关系如何。

element by

. This procedure requires the supplier to conduct fit and functional approval on their sub-

entering

suppliers prior to PPAP submission to Ford

r, y, or g in

有程序要求供方执行安装和能力批准于分供方，先于PPAP交于Ford.

cell above

I.4.7

X

Run-at-Rate must be completed and supports the stated program requirements (at full-volume

. Supplier submits capacity verification documentation and is in compliance to all newly

Rate this

production levels) for all Ford parts.

launched or added capacity parts.

sub-

所有Ford零件节拍生产必须完成并支持计划要求（全量产水平）。

供方提交能力验证文件，并满足新的量产或增加产能的零件。

element by

entering

Note:

r, y, or g in

Confirm CPV with buyer, if unknown

cell above

注：若不知道，与买方一起确认

CPV

。

I.4.8

X

Capacity Verification must include the following elements and be performed on the entire

. Supplier complies with Ford's documented capacity verification procedure, referenced

Rate this

process or the slowest operation (process bottleneck): machine available hours, shifts, days,

in FSP. (Run-at-Rate and capacity verification are part of Phased PPAP available on

sub-

machine downtime (planned and unplanned), machine change over, breaks, and quality or

/sta/Phased_)

element by

scrap.

供方遵循Ford能力验证程序，参考FSP（Run-at-Rate，PPAP阶段能力验证可在

entering

能力验证必须包括以下要素表并在全部过程执行或最慢工序（瓶颈工序）加工可能的小时，班

/sta/Phased_获得）。

r, y, or g in次，天数，停机时间（计划和非计划），换模，休息，质量，报废。

cell above

. Supplier's supporting documents demonstrate compliance to all newly launched or

increased capacity parts.

供方有支持性文件正式满足新的量产和增加产能零件。

. Supplier provides timing on all newly launched or increased capacity parts (i.e., Gantt

charts)

供方提供新的量产或增加零件产能的时程（例：甘特图）。

. Supplier utilizes overtime in accordance with local law.

供方加班符合当地法律。

I.4.9

X

Supplier monitors capacity and has a process to ensure on-going sufficient capacity on all Ford

. Supplier is compliant to Ford's product releases.

Rate this

parts.

供方遵循Ford产品发布系统。

sub-

供方监控能力并由于ige过程保证所有Ford零件有持续的足够的产能。

element by

. Staffing support for Capacity Planning Volumes takes into account turnover rate and

entering

absenteeism.

员工的离职率和缺勤率支持策划的产能。

r, y, or g in

cell above

15 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

AllResponsibility

t

a

i

l

i

&

期望

b

e

D

g

Expectation

n

t

人

t

a

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

n

Expectations,and Due Date

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

i

n

限

s

o

n

任

D

限

o

i

期

i

e

t

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

Supplier monitors capacity and has a process to ensure on-going sufficient capacity on all Ford

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

o

t

p

责

e

u

期

l

成

a

t

D

/

c

Rate this

R

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

l

parts.

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

m

完

e

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

sub-

e

-

供方监控能力并由于ige过程保证所有Ford零件有持续的足够的产能。

shall haverated

R

o

C

element by

x

b

是/。

E

u

documentedExpectations)

entering

S

evidence

所有黄色和红

r, y, or g in

listed,

色期望要求由

cell above

.Supplier has a process to communicate Ford production requirements to sub-suppliers,

and monitors and measures its ongoing effectiveness to ensure 100% delivery of sub-

supplier components to meet supplier/Ford demand.

供方有一个过程监控，测量分供方的现场效率以保证100%发送，满足供方Ford要求。

. Supplier has a plan to support capacity requirements in case of production

interruptions due to equipment failure and/or sub-supplier performance issues.

供方有一个计划去支持能力要求，万一生产由于设备失效/分供方的问题引起中断 。

INC

I.5. Manage the Change

I.5.1

Supplier has a documented process to effectively implement post - Job 1 design changes,

.Supplier has a documented manage the change procedure (e.g. similar to the SREA -

process changes, or volume changes.

Supplier Request for Engineering Approval for process changes).

供方有文件化管理变更过程(如：类似SREA)

供方有文件化过程有效执行，Job 1设计变更或产量变更。

. Supplier can validate the procedure with a current example of a change.

供方用当前变更的确认程序。

I.5.2

X

Supplier effectively reviews and updates its quality supporting documentation for these changes.

. Supplier has a process to implement internal and external suppliers' (tier 2 or tier 3,

Rate this

Examples of documents that may require changes: Process Flow Diagrams, FMEAs, Control

etc.) proposed changes, which may or may not involve Ford.

sub-

Plans, Operator Instructions, Visual Aids, and PPAP documentation.

供方有一个过程执行内部和外部供方（2级或3级）的建议性变更，可能或不可能与Ford

element by

供方有效地评审和更新变更相关的质量支持性文件，例如：过程流程图，FMEAS，控制计划，

相关。

entering

作业指导书，可视化辅具和PPAP文件。

r, y, or g in

. Supplier identifies new CTQ metrics associated with the change and implements valid

cell above

measurement system(s) to track key measurables associated with the process change.

供方识别与变更相关的新的CTQ，并确认与变更过程相关的关键测量的测量系统有效性

。

. Supplier can demonstrate effective communication to Ford of a change using the

SREA process.

供方能证实利用SREA过程有效与Ford沟通变更。

.Supplier can validate the process using the most recent change, either initiated

internally or by sub-suppliers.

供方能有效确认应用最新的变更，无论初始内部还是分供方。

I.5.3

X

Supplier follows a documented process to ensure that proper Ford approvals are gained prior to

. Supplier reviews each and every change and determines whether that change requires

Rate this

making process changes. The approval process will include use of Supplier Request for

customer approval.

sub-

Engineering Approvals (SREAs), Change Request/Concern Report (CR/CR) in Worldwide

供方评审每一个变更确定是否需顾客批准。

element by

Engineering Release System (WERS), Management Alerts, and revised PPAP documentation,

entering

as appropriate.

Note:

r, y, or g in

供方跟踪文件过程以保证在过程变更之前获得Ford的批准，适当时批准过程在WERS里的

Refer to the manage the change procedure in the PPAP manual SREA procedure is

cell above

CR/CR，管理警报和更新PPAP文件。

available on /

注：参考

PPAP

手册中有关变更管理，

SERA

程序可在

ttps:///

获得。

Note:

Ford plant functional approval requirement is located on the AIAG PPAP Manual

Checklist.

注：

Ford

工厂功能批准要求在

手册检查表中。

16 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

AllResponsibility

t

a

e

&

Expectation期望

i

l

i

Expectations,and Due Date

b

D

g

n

t

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

i

人

t

a

n

限

s

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

o

n

n

i

n

任

D

限

o

i

期

i

e

t

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

o

t

p

责

e

u

期

l

成

a

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

m

完

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

NOTE: Manufacturing

listed,

色期望要求由

Process

Questionnaires are

available through a

separate document

.c

om/sta/Manufacturing

注：制造过程问卷可从

_Process_Checklists.

/sta/Manufacturing_Process_Check

II. Demonstration of Manufacturing Process Capability

制造过程能力验证

xls for the following

获得电镀、紧固、冲压、焊接、塑模、喷漆、电子PCB

processes:

和最终装配、扭矩和加工。热处理可参考FORD W-HTX热处理要求和

Electroplating,

AIAG发布的CQI-9“特殊过程：热处理系统要求”。W-HTX和CQI-9

Fasteners, Stamping,

评价和过程检查表的目的在于提供Q1现场评价的支持。

Welding, Plastics

Molding, Painting,

Electronic PCB and

Final Assembly,

Fastener Torque and

INC

II.1. Sub-supplier Quality Management

II.1.1

Supplier has a defined process for managing its supply base including identification of those with

w Supplier has a defined process for managing its supply base, including resources

high impact to quality.

to work with sub-suppliers.

供方有明确的流程管理其供方，包括识别那些对质量有较高影响度的。

供方有明确的过程来管理其供货商，包括投入与分供方一起工作的资源。

w Supplier has a process of identifying sub-suppliers with a high impact on quality.

供方有能力识别对质量产生较大影响的分供方.

w Supplier has a means of communication to notify high impact sub-suppliers of their

status (i.e., e-mail, letter, meeting minutes, database systems, etc.).

供方有与有高影响的分供沟通相关状态的流程（例如，电子邮件，信函，会议记录，数

据系统，等）。

w Supplier has a plan in place to develop value stream maps of their tier 1 and 2

suppliers.

供方有一个在运作中的计划，来发展其一阶及二阶供货商的价值流程图。

Note:

Communication includes FMEAs, control plans, pass-through characteristics (where

required), and PPAPs.

注：沟通包括FMEA's, 管制计划，通过特性，和PPAP's.

II.1.2

Supplier requires sub-suppliers to have a quality operating system that is similar to ISO/TS

w Sub-supplier compliance to ISO/TS 16949 is demonstrated through self-assessment

16949, or VDA. Supplier verifies sub-supplier compliance by annual on-site assessment of high

or third party registration.

impact sub-supplier facilities.

分供方透过自我评估或第三方认证证明满足ISO/TS 16949要求。

供方要求分供方有类似ISO/TS 16949或VDA的质量操作系统。供方通过每年对高影响的分供方

w Supplier visits sub-suppliers on a predetermined frequency and conducts on-site

设备的现场评估来验证分供方的符合性。

assessments.

供方预先确定的频率次数访问分供方并进行现场评估。

w Supplier has documented evidence of these assessments.

供方有这些评估的书面证据。

w Supplier communicates working conditions expectations to sub-tier suppliers and

requires compliance to local labor law.

供方与分供方沟通工作条件期望并要求遵循当地劳动法。

II.1.3

X

Supplier requires PPAP for all parts from sub-suppliers (regardless of sub-supplier business

w Supplier ensures that all sub-supplier PPAP requirements are met, including fit and

Rate this

relationship with Ford).

part functional approval prior to getting PPAP approval from ford.

sub-

供方需要从分供方那里获得所有零件的PPAP(无论分供方与福特的关系如何)。

供方确保所有分供方满足PPAP要求，包括从福特获得PPAP批准前对分供方的零件进

element by

行装配和性能批准。

entering

w All sub-supplier parts have PPAP documentation.

r, y, or g in

所有分供方的零件都有PPAP文件。

cell above

w Supplier updates PPAP for any change in production part or process.

供方对任何生产零件或制程的变更都要更新PPAP相关文件.

17 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

e

期

子

Supplier requires PPAP for all parts from sub-suppliers (regardless of sub-supplier business

证据

(Action Plan,

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

e

&

Rate this

AllResponsibility

i

l

i

b

D

t

a

n

sub-

Expectations,and Due Date

i

g

relationship with Ford).

Expectation期望

t

人

n

限

s

D

限

o

n

n

o

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

i

供方需要从分供方那里获得所有零件的

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

PPAP(无论分供方与福特的关系如何)。

n

i

element by

i

e

t

o

任

t

期

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

p

e

u

期

l

成

a

t

D

/

c

entering

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

责

p

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

e

e

e

R

m

完

r, y, or g in

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

cell above

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

w When the supplier submits PPAP documentation to Ford, it contains sub-suppliers'

PPAP information and/or it is available for review.

当供方向福特递交PPAP文件时，包括外包商的PPAP数据和/或该PPAP数据可随时备

查。

w When a PPAP is submitted to Ford, all sub-supplier PPAPs are updated if the original

PPAP documentation is more than one year old.

当向福特递交PPAP文件时,如果原来所有分供方的PPAP文件已经超过一年,其PPAP文

件必须更新。

w Supplier requires annual dimensional validation of all parts from sub-suppliers

(regardless of sub-supplier business relationship with Ford).

供方需要每年从分供方那里获得所有零件的年度确认尺寸(无论分供方福特的关系如何)

。

Note:

It is recommended that sub-supplier PPAPs comply with the AIAG manual

注: 建议分供方遵循AIAG PPAP手册的要求。

II.1.4

X

Where Ford has defined an Engineering Specification (ES), or special characteristics that are the

w Supplier has documented records of sub-suppliers' compliance to engineering

Rate this

responsibility of the sub-supplier, the sub-supplier must show compliance to the ES or special

specifications or special characteristics

sub-

characteristics in its PPAP submission to the Tier one supplier.

供方有书面记录证明分供方满足工程规范或特殊要求。

element by

福特规定工程规范(ES)，或特殊特性，若由分供方负责，分供方必须在向一级供方提交的PPAP

entering

中展现出符合ES或特殊特性。

r, y, or g in

cell above

II.1.5

X

Where pass-through characteristics are required, supplier requires sub-suppliers to take specific

w Where pass-through characteristics are required, supplier has a process to identify

Rate this

actions to ensure that all pass-through characteristics are to customer specifications.

and handle sub-supplier pass-through characteristics, utilizing error-proofing methods.

sub-

当通过特性被要求时，供方要求分供方采取特殊行动，确保所有的通过特性满足顾客的规格。

当通过特性要求时，供方利用防错的方法，识别和处理分供方的通过特性。

element by

entering

r, y, or g in

cell above

w Where pass-through characteristics are required, robust controls are implemented

within the process control plans / work instructions to manage pass-through

characteristics.

透过制程管制计划/作业指导书来实行稳定的控制以管理通过特性。

w Where pass-through characteristics are required, supplier can demonstrate that

pass-through characteristics are analyzed on all new parts and planned for current

parts.

供方可以证明通过特性在所有的新零件上都得到分析，并在目前的零件上排定了计划.

w Where pass-through characteristics are required, all pass-through characteristics are

identified on the sub-supplier's PFMEA and control plan/work instructions, and

integrated into the supplier's PFMEA and control plan.

当通过特性有要求时，所有的通过特性都识别在了分供方的PFMEA和控制计划/作业指

导书中，并融入了供方的PFMEA和控制计划中。

w Evidence must exist that the supplier has validated sub-supplier's PFMEAs and

Control Plans to ensure:-

- All part characteristics are considered against the definition below.

- Controls used are appropriate regarding method and frequency.

必需有证据表明供方确认了分供方的PFMEA和控制计划以确保：

--所有的特性依以下定义被考虑

--应用适当的方法和频次进行控制

Note:

A "Pass Through Characteristic" is one that is NOT subsequently used or checked

beyond the sub supplier that generated it

注：

通过特性是分供方产生的不能随后的被应用和被检查

II.1.6

X

Supplier must confirm sub-supplier compliance by review and approval of sub-supplier PPAP

w Supplier has a process to approve PPAP approved parts before they are

Rate this

submission prior to incorporation of product in supplier manufacturing process.

incorporated into the process.

sub-

供方在将产品融入制造过程前，必须通过审核和确认外包商提交的PPAP，以确保外包商符合要

在进入生产制程之前供方有审核PPAP零件的流程。

element by

求。

entering

r, y, or g in

cell above

18 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

e

期

子

证据

(Action Plan,

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

AllResponsibility

t

b

D

i

g

Expectation期望

a

n

t

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

n

限

D

限

o

n

n

o

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

n

i

i

e

t

o

任

t

期

e

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

p

a

责

u

期

l

成

t

D

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

p

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

e

m

完

/

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

Supplier must confirm sub-supplier compliance by review and approval of sub-supplier PPAP

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

Rate this

u

S

submission prior to incorporation of product in supplier manufacturing process.

documentedExpectations)

sub-

供方在将产品融入制造过程前，必须通过审核和确认外包商提交的PPAP，以确保外包商符合要

evidence

所有黄色和红

element by

求。

listed,

色期望要求由

w Supplier has a sub-supplier functional approval process for machining, raw materials,

entering

sub-assemblies, heat treat, plating, etc. Additionally, all heat treat processes,

r, y, or g in

regardless of tier, must comply with Ford W-HTX and CQI-9

cell above

Special Process: Heat Treat System Assessment requirements, including an annual

assessment to CQI-9 for all tiers.

供方拥有对分供方确认加工，原材料，线外组装，热处理，电镀等工艺的批准过程 。

另外，所有热处理过程，不管级级别，必须遵循FORD W-HTX和CQI-9。

特殊过程：热处理系统评价要求包括所有级别供方的年度CQI-9评价。

II.1.7

X

Supplier conducts systemic reviews with sub-suppliers and assures implementation of corrective

w Supplier has a procedure in place that defines how to manage sub-suppliers'

Rate this

actions across supplier facilities for all issues resulting in stop ship or field action.

generated defects (e.g., 8D review process), including permanent corrective action

sub-

供货商能对外包商造成停止出货或市场召回的相关设施，进行系统的评审，并确保校正行动的执

verification process

element by行。

供方有一个在运作中的程序来管理分供方产生的不良问题（例如，8D评审流程）， 包

entering

括对其永久性校正行动的确认流程

r, y, or g in

w Sub-suppliers have a documented problem solving methodology.

cell above

分供方有问题解决方法的书面记录。

w Supplier has a procedure in place to conduct random incoming quality audits to verify

effectiveness of the corrective actions implemented by a sub-supplier.

供方有进行随机进料检验的程序在运作中，以验证分供方实施的纠正措施的有效性。

INC

II.2. Control of Incoming Quality

II.2.1

X

Supplier has a strategy for receiving inspection.

w Supplier's special characteristics are identified for incoming inspection.

Rate this

供方有接收进货质量检验的策略。

供识别出进料检验的特殊特性。

sub-

element by

w The frequency of inspection is greater on high risk sub-suppliers

entering

针对高风险分供方的检查频率要更高。

r, y, or g in

II.2.2

X

Incoming quality requirements are part of a control plan. If incoming quality inspections are

w Incoming quality is defined on control plans

Rate this

made, there is evidence of the specification and compliance to the specification. If no incoming

进料质量在控制计划中有被定义。

sub-

inspections are made, there is a rationale for qualifying sub-suppliers.

w If incoming inspections are made, supplier shows compliance to the specifications

element by

进料检验要求是控制计划的一部分。如果进行了进料检验，有证据表明规范符合要求；如果没有

如果进行了进料检验，供方表明符合规格。

entering进行进料检验，则有分供方认可的制度。

r, y, or g in

w Supplier has supporting rationale if no incoming inspections are made.

cell above

如果不进行进料检验,供方要有合理的免检理由。

w Supplier has an operator-based SPC control plan in place

供方要有以作业员为主执行的SPC控制计划在运作中。

II.2.3

X

Incoming Quality Operator follows a reaction plan if raw material or purchased part is found to be

w Supplier has a containment policy for incoming quality (i.e., tagging, identifying type of

Rate this

out of specification.

defect, log of defects, 8D review process).

sub-

如果原材料或采购的零件超出规范，进料检验员有反应计划可循。

供方对进料检验有防堵政策(例如，标志，识别缺陷的种类， 记录缺陷，8D评审流程)。

element by

entering

r, y, or g in

w Supplier has a resolution process for incoming inspection rejects.

cell above

供方对进料检验拒收的产品，有处理的流程。

w Supplier assigns responsibility for resolution, progress is being tracked, and sufficient

time is allocated to implement permanent corrective action.

供方规定了问题解决的职责，可跟踪的过程和足够的时间来实施永久性校正行动。

II.2.4

X

Supplier has appropriate resources to manage sub-supplier quality including on-site assessment

w Supplier has a process to review sub-supplier quality systems.

Rate this

of high impact sub-supplier facilities.

供货有过程评审分供方质量系统。

sub-

供方有相应的资源来管理分供方的质量，包括现场评估高影响分供方的设施。

w When non-conformities are present, supplier and sub-supplier have specific reaction

element by

plans

entering

当有不合格发生时，供方和分供方有特定的反应计划。

r, y, or g in

cell above

INC

II.3 Control Plans / Operator Instructions

控制计划/作业指导书

II.3.1

Standardized operator instructions (including control plans, work instructions, job aids, check

sheets, job set-up instructions, and illustrations) are developed and available for operators.

建立标准化的作业指导书（包括控制计划，作业指导书，工作辅具，检查表，作业准备指导书，

和解释）并提供给作业员。

19 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

AllResponsibility

t

b

D

i

g

Expectation期望

a

n

t

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

D

限

o

n

n

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

n

i

e

t

任

o

i

t

期

o

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

p

a

责

e

u

期

l

成

t

D

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

p

e

m

完

/

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

II.3.1

evidence

所有黄色和红

X

Standardized operator instructions (including control plans, work instructions, job aids, check

listed,

色期望要求由

w Work instructions have all of the necessary details, including quality acceptance

Rate this

sheets, job set-up instructions, and illustrations) are developed and available for operators.

criteria, process and product control parameters, reference to product drawing release

sub-

建立标准化的作业指导书（包括控制计划，作业指导书，工作辅具，检查表，作业准备指导书，

level and date, specific/special gauges and tools required, reaction plan for process and

element by和解释）并提供给作业员。product non-compliance, point of contact, etc.

entering

作业指导书包括所有必须的细节，包括质量允收准则，制程和产品 控制参数，参照产

r, y, or g in

品图纸发布版次和日期，所需的特殊量具和工具，过程和产品不符合时的反应计划，联

cell above

系人等。

w Supplier has a process to identify those manufacturing process changes which

require an initial production quality check, e.g. changes or adjustment of tooling, tool

refurbishment, restart of a machine after a shut-down, rotational of personnel with

operator dependent processes, etc. The supplier should also record the results of the

initial production quality check.

供方有过程识别制造过程的更改，这些要求初始的生产质量检查，例工装的更改或调整

、工装重新磨光、停机后后重新起动、依人工操作的过程的人员流动等。供方记录最初

的生产质量检查记录。

w Supplier can demonstrate operator compliance to the work instructions.

供方能够证明作业员遵守作业指导书。

II.3.2

X

Standardized operator instructions are legible, specific, and controlled. The instructions are

w Supplier can demonstrate that operators are adequately trained and supervised in

Rate this

available in the area where the work is being performed and are followed by operators as written.

correctly carrying out their process function in line with the available documented

sub-

标准化的作业指导书清晰，明确，且受控。在工作地点存放作业指导书并保证得到作业员的遵守

instructions, including the correct disposition of set-up and scrap parts.

element by。

供方能证明作业员有经过完整的训练和及在有受督导的状况下正确的执行其工作内容，

entering

内容包括作业准备和报废零件的处置。

r, y, or g in

cell above

w Wherever possible, visual aids are employed at the work station to define and focus

on compliance/non-compliance.

在可能的情况下，工作站有目视辅助工具来协助定义符合/不符合的标准。

w If there is a multi-lingual workforce, supplier can demonstrate work instructions are

understood.

如果是多语言的工作团队，供方要能证明人人能了解作业指导书的内容。

II.3.3

X

Reaction plans are clearly defined and protect Ford from non-conforming materials.

w Operators understand the consequences of non-compliant parts and subsequent

Rate this

明确规定的反应计划并且保护福特不受到不合格原料的影响。

failure reaching the customer (i.e., downstream operation or to the end customer).

sub-

作业员理解将不合格零件及其失效影响传递到顾客后的后果（例如，下游的操作或最终

element by

顾客）。

entering

w Supplier has a process of notifying customers if non-conforming product has left the

r, y, or g insupplier's facility.

cell above

如果不合格的产品已发运离开供方的工厂，供方有通知顾客的程序。

w Supplier has a containment process if non-compliant parts reach the customer.

如果不合格零件有送交到顾客手中，供方有反应计划。

w Work instructions specify a reaction plan if suspect or non-compliant parts get

through the system.

如果不合格或可疑的产品通过了整个系统，作业指导书有明确的反应计划对应。

w This procedure and/or reaction plan instructs the operator or quality activity on what

to do next.

程序和/或反应计划指导作业员或品管活动人员下一步做什么动作。

II.3.4

X

Control Plans are revised and updated when products or processes differ from those in current

w Control plans are accurate and up to date with latest product/drawing and

Rate this

production.

process revisions.

sub-

当产品或过程与目前的生产状态不同时，需修改或更新控制计划。

控制计划有随时精确的反应产品/图纸和制程内容最新的修改。

element by

entering

For more information, refer to the AIAG Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)

INC

II.4 Process Variability Monitoring/Reduction

过程变差监控/减少

manual or the Statistical Process Control Manual (SPC) .

如须知更多资料,详情请参阅AIAG 生产性零件审核过程(PPAP)手册或统计过程控制手册

（SPC)

II.4.1

Supplier has determined appropriate statistical techniques. A key aspect of defect prevention is

w Supplier has an operator-based statistical process control or process monitoring

process variability reduction and the use of SPC or an equivalent process monitoring method to

method in place (e.g., histogram, control charts, records of process conformance with

indicate when action is necessary, and conversely, when processes should be left alone.

rotation of personnel or after unplanned shutdowns, etc.).

供方采取了合适的统计技术。防止错误的关键是减少过程变异和使用SPC来指出何时必须采取行

供方有以作业员为主执行的统计制程管制的方法在运作中。（例如，直方图，控制图，

动（比如调整和改变工具/模具），和相反地，何时应该让过程自己解决。

人员流动的过程绩效或计划外停机等）

20 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

e

期

子

证据

(Action Plan,

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

Expectation期望

AllResponsibility

b

D

t

i

g

a

n

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

Expectations,and Due Date

人

n

限

t

s

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

D

限

o

n

n

i

n

任

o

i

t

期

i

e

t

o

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

Supplier has determined appropriate statistical techniques. A key aspect of defect prevention is

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

p

a

责

e

u

期

l

成

t

D

c

e

process variability reduction and the use of SPC or an equivalent process monitoring method to

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

p

/

l

e

m

完

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

indicate when action is necessary, and conversely, when processes should be left haverated

C

x

b

是/。

E

u

供方采取了合适的统计技术。防止错误的关键是减少过程变异和使用SPC来指出何时必须采取行

S

documentedExpectations)

动（比如调整和改变工具/模具），和相反地，何时应该让过程自己解决。

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

w These methods of control are appropriate for the given process or product

characteristics (i.e., X bar - R chart, Individual Moving Range chart, np charts, median

charts, etc. -- SPC toolbox).

针对特定的制程和产品特性采用的这些管制方法运用适当。 （例如，均值极差图，移

动极差图，不良数控制图，中位数控制图，等---SPC工具箱）

w The process is equipped with process controls, in-line gauging, etc.

制程中有控制点，在线量具检测等。

w Supplier reviews data and makes appropriate improvements to the process.

供方评审数据并对过程做出适当的改善。

II.4.2

X

Operator-based SPC control charts are optimized for statistically valid sample frequency, sample

w The operator-based charts are being utilized to drive changes within the process

Rate this

size, and appropriate chart type. SPC checks are performed on a timely basis and out-of-control

操作员参与制作的图表数据被利用来驱动制程的改变。

sub-

conditions prompt corrective action as appropriate.

w The operator-based charts capture what changes have been made to the process to

element by

以作业员为主执行的控制图表根据样本频率，样本容量和相应的图表类型而做有效的整合。SPC

enable verification that adjustment is statistically beneficial (e.g., passes 2-proportion or

entering

要定时执行检查,并且在过程失控时，启动适当的纠正措施。

2 Sample T test) to the process (tooling changes, machine down time, die change,

r, y, or g in

etc.)

cell above

以作业员为主执行的图表标示出制程内有做出了那些改变，以确认(例如:通过双比例或

双样本T检定) 这些调整(工具/模具变更，机器停机时间，换模，等) 是否对制程有帮助

。

II.4.3

X

SPC data is maintained, monitored and used by the equipment operators to drive process and

w Evidence of process improvements include: reductions in scrap, reductions in

Rate this

product improvements by reducing process variability. Evidence of process improvements

rework/repair, and DPU; increases in first-time through capabilities, Rolled Throughput

sub-

include: reductions in scrap, reductions in rework/repair, and DPU; increases in first-time through

Yield (YRT), Cpk, Process Sigma level, records of error proofing mechanism

element by

capabilities, Rolled Throughput Yield (YRT), Cpk, Process Sigma level, records of error proofing

implementation; and reductions in machine downtime.

entering

mechanism implementation; and reductions in machine downtime.

过程改善的证据包括了：废品的减少，减少返工/返修和DPU，增加首次合格率，作业

r, y, or g in

设备操作员维持,监控和运用SPC数据，并透过减少制程的变差来驱动制程和产品的改进。制程改

的制程合格件产出(YRT)，Cpk,制程标准偏差程度，执行防错机制的记录;及减少机器停

cell above

进的证据包括：减少报废，减少返工/返修和DPU，提升一次通过率， 滚动产出率, cpk, 提升制程

机时间。

标准差水平,防错机制实施的记录,和减少停机时间。

w Operator-based SPC charts capture when a change has been made and that the

process has been effectively improved by statistically different before and after data.

以作业员为主执行的SPC图表，捕获已发生的变化，统计制程变动前后的数据差异，可

显示制程改善的有效性。

w The equipment operator uses the charts to monitor for out of control conditions.

过程不在控制状态时，设备操作员使用图表来监视制程。

w The cause for an out of control condition is identified and recorded by the equipment

operator, including any action to remedy condition.

设备操作员识别和记录过程不在控制状态的原因，包括因补救问题做任何的应对措施。

w The charts are reviewed by the equipment operator for recurring patterns and

corresponding reaction plans are sufficient

设备操作员审核图表以查看有无再发的模式出现，并确定对应的反应计划是否足够。

w If a new cause has been identified, the equipment operator has a method to

communicate issues, through the appropriate channels, to the process owner to

ensure that FMEAs/Control plan/work instructions, etc. are updated.

如果发现了新的问题肇因，设备操作员有特定的方法及管道和该制程负责人沟通相关问

题，以确认FMEAs/管制计划/作业指导书等更新。

II.4.4

X

Ppk and Cpk levels are greater than or equal to 1.67 and 1.33 respectively, for all SCs

w Supplier has a Ppk/Cpk tracking mechanism in place.

Rate thisand HICs (where applicable). For all SCs and CCs, Cpk trends are tracked over time,

供方有Ppk/Cpk的追踪机制在运作中。

sub-

and action plans have been put in place to increase these Cpk values by a process of

w Where the supplier has reduced the frequency of SPC charting, there is statistical

element by

continuously reducing the causes of variability. These trends are part of the Supplier's

evidence to support this reduction and/or some other method of control is in place.

entering

Management routine review.

(i.e., they become part of a preventive maintenance program, tool management

r, y, or g in

CCs require an appropriate control method that prevents shipment of non-conforming

program, die maintenance / replacement program, equipment vibration analysis

cell above

product to Ford.

program, etc.).

(当适用时) 所有的SC, CC, 和 HICs的Ppk和Cpk水平分别大于 1.67和1.33。

供方有统计证据，证明降低SPC 控制图的检查频率,及/或用其他适当的管制方法。(如，

所有的SC和 CC Cpk趋势都要持续追踪，而且须有各种能减少制程变异的行动计划在运作中来

他们成为预防性维护项目的一部分，工模具管理项目，模具维护/更换计划，设备振动

提升Cpk值。这些Cpk趋势将会是供方管理阶层例行审核的内容。

分析措施等。)

w Supplier has a method of analyzing and managing statistically generated data (SPC

charts) on the manufacturing process(es) that produce Ford part(s), e.g., Six Sigma.

供 对属于生产福特零件的制程所量测出的一般数据，拥有能力进行分析和管理的质量

手法（SPC控制图）例如:六个标准偏差。

21 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

Ppk and Cpk levels are greater than or equal to 1.67 and 1.33 respectively, for all SCs

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Rate this

Supplier Site Code

and HICs (where applicable). For all SCs and CCs, Cpk trends are tracked over time,

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

sub-

Supplier Contact Name

and action plans have been put in place to increase these Cpk values by a process of

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

element by

continuously reducing the causes of variability. These trends are part of the Supplier's

entering

Supplier Contact Phone#

Management routine review.

供方联络电话

:

r, y, or g in

CCs require an appropriate control method that prevents shipment of non-conforming

Comments /

Action Plan纠

cell above

&

素

望

要

product to Ford.

Evidence 注释/

正措施

e

期

子

证据

(Action Plan,

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

(当适用时) 所有的SC, CC, 和 HICs的Ppk和Cpk水平分别大于 1.67和1.33。

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

所有的SC和 CC Cpk趋势都要持续追踪，而且须有各种能减少制程变异的行动计划在运作中来

Expectation期望

AllResponsibility

t

b

D

i

g

a

n

t

Expectations,and Due Date

人

n

限

s

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

D

限

o

n

n

i

提升Cpk值。这些Cpk

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

趋势将会是供方管理阶层例行审核的内容。

n

i

e

t

e

t

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

任

o

i

t

期

o

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

p

a

m

a

R

u

期

t

D

c

e

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

Color Rating,yellow and red

责

e

l

成

s

p

l

e

m

完

/

e

e

shall haverated

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

documented

C

x

b

是/。

E

u

S

Expectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

w Cpk data is used to drive process enhancements that have an impact on product

CTQ characteristics (e.g., moving upstream to manage KPIV [Key Process Input

Variable] characteristics, such as, tool feed rate and speed, coolant temperature,

bearing failure rate, tool management strategy, etc.).

运用Cpk数据来驱动提升那些对产品关键质量特性(CTQ)有影响的过程（例如，上工序

关键输入变量(KPIV)特性，像是进刀量和进刀速度，冷却器温度，轴承损坏率，工模具

管理策略，等）。

w If supplier is not statistically monitoring process/product, how is capability ensured?

如果供方没有统计技术以监控制程/产品，那能力如何确保？

w For all Ford design identified special characteristics (e.g., SCs), Ppk is > 1.67 and

Cpk is > 1.33. (Cpk of 1.33 is approximately a 4 Sigma process)

对于所有福特设计识别的特性(SC's, CC's)，Ppk≧ 1.67，

并且Cpk≧1.33.(Cpk 1.33 相当于4个标准偏差的制程能力)。

w If variable data is used on HICs (where applicable), then Ppk and Cpk levels are

greater than 1.67 and 1.33, respectively.

如果HICs是计量值数据(如果适用时)，其Ppk和Cpk水平分别要大于1.67和1.33。

w If SCs or HICs (where applicable) are not capable, control plans are in place to

ensure that product is validated prior to shipment, and robust corrective action plans

are in place.

如果SCs, CCs 或HICs(如果有的话)的制程能力不足，在运作中的控制计划需能确保产

品在出货前经过质量确认，并有严谨的纠正措施。

w Cpk and Ppk values are calculated for only processes that are stable and in control.

只有稳定并且在控制状态的过程，才可计算Cpk和PPk值。

Note:

CRITICAL CHARACTERISTICS (CC): Critical characteristics are designated with the

inverted delta symbol (

s

) and are those product requirements (dimensions,

performance tests, etc.) or process parameters (rates, temperatures, pressures, etc.)

that can affect compliance with government regulations, or safe vehicle/product

function, and which require specific producer, assembly, shipping or monitoring action

and the inclusion on the Control Plan.

SIGNIFICANT CHARACTERISTICS (SC): Significant Characteristics are those

product, process, and test requirements that are important for customer satisfaction

and for which Quality Planning actions must be addressed in a Control Plan.

HIGH IMPACT CHARACTERISTIC (HI): High Impact Characteristics are related to

parameters that severely affect the operation of the process or subsequent operations

if they are outside of the specification tolerance.

Characteristics

Operator Safety (OS) characteristics are related to parameters that do

not affect the product but may have an impact on the safety or

governmental regulations applicable for the process operation, e.g.,

Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] requirements,

Ford Health and Safety Specifications. This is a hazard for in-plant

operators. These characteristics should be included on a safety signoff.

These are failure modes with a severity rating of 9 or 10 due to an

effect of the process on the process operator.

注：

关键特性(CC) - 设计上用倒三角"(s) “表示，产品要求(尺寸、表现测试等)或过程参数(比率、温度、

压力等)影响对法规的符合性或车辆/产品安全功能，并需要供方在制造，装配，装运，监督，和/或

检查特别措施的特性，并包含 在控制计划中。

重要特性(SC) - "产品，过程和测试类特性，当其在规定的公差范围内减少变差，围绕目标值会改进

顾客满意度，质量策划措施在控制计划中述叙。

高影响度特性(HIC) - 影响过程操作的参数或当超出规格范围会严重影响下一步操作的特性。

作业安全特性(OS)-不影响产品但可能影响安全或过程操作中政府法规的应用，如职业安全和健康

(OSHA)。FORD健康和安全规范。有害于工厂作业员的特性。这些特性应包含在安全签证。由于

过程作业员对过程的影响，这些失效模式对应的严重度是9或10。

II.4.5

X

Machine capability for SCs, CCs and HICs (where applicable) must be demonstrated on all new

w Supplier has procedures in place to qualify new equipment, specifically for SCs and

Rate this

equipment and tooling.

CCs

sub-

适用时，SCs, CCs and HICs的设备能力必须在新的设备和工装得到论证。

供方有新设备资格确定程序，尤其是针对SC's和CC's。

element by

w Supplier can provide historical records of machine capability on HICs.

entering

供方能提供HICs的机器能力履历纪录。

r, y, or g inNote:

cell aboveMachine capability is defined as a short-term capability study (Ppk).

注：机器能力被定义为短期的制程能力研究(Ppk)。

22 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

e

期

子

证据

(Action Plan,

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

l

i

&

AllResponsibility

b

e

D

t

i

g

Expectation期望

n

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

a

n

限

t

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

o

n

n

n

D

限

o

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

i

o

任

t

期

i

e

t

e

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

p

l

成

a

t

c

e

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

责

u

期

D

p

l

e

m

完

/

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

For more information, refer to the AIAG Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA)

INC

II.5. Measurement System Capability, Calibration and Use

manual (hyperlink below):

如须知更多资料,详情请参阅AIAG 量测系统分析(MSA)手册(连结如下):

/

II.5.1

X

Supplier ensures that all gauges are available for use as identified in the control plan to support

w Supplier can validate gauge availability on-site per the control plan.

Rate this

Ford requirements. The gauge calibration and gauge maintenance program ensures that back-

供方能确认控制计划中的量具的有效性。

sub-

up gauges or a back-up gauging process is available to support inspections required by the

w Gauges are available on-site with the appropriate capability (e.g., appropriate gauge,

element by

control plan.

measurement method and datum point) to meet the measurement requirements of the

entering

供方确保控制计划中规定的所有量具可获得有效使用以支持FORD要求。量具校准和量具维护计

control plan.

r, y, or g in

划需确保有备份量具，或备份量测流程可以有效支持控制计划要求的检查。

In exceptional circumstances, if measurement capability is not available on-site, the

cell above

supplier has a defined strategy for using a third party for this item, including timing and

availability.

现场可获得适当能力的检具满足控制的要求(如适当的检具、测量方法和基准点)。因环

境要求，现场无测量能力，供方有确定策略利用第三方测量，包括时程和能力

w Supplier has evidence that a published schedule is followed and on-track for the

calibration and maintenance of inspection, measuring and test equipment (including

test software).

供方有证据显示拥有一个发布的日程安排表，依表行事及追踪有关量测与测试设备(包

括测试软件)的校准与检验维护。

w Gauging procedures with visual aids are posted at the work station

有目视化辅助的量测程序书张贴在作业站上。

II.5.2

w Supplier has a gauge R & R tracking mechanism in place.

Variable gauges are used for all SCs and CCs, whenever possible. HIC gauges are per the

供方有量具再生/再现性分析(Gage R&R)追踪机制在运作中。

X

control plan. All gauges (company and employee-owned) are identified per the control plan.

w Both company and personal gauges are evaluated and tracked.

Rate this

无论何时，对所有的SC和CCs运用不同的量具。HIC量具则按各控制计划所列使用。所有的量具

公司和员工的量具都得到评估和追踪。

sub-（公司和员工个人的）均按控制计划识别。

w There is a process in place to drive compliance.

element by

有促进符合要求的程序书在运作中。

entering

w Is the tracking system automated or manual?

r, y, or g in

追踪体系是自动的还是人工的？

cell above

w If variable gauges are not being used, supplier can provide solid justification as to

why not.

如果没有使用计量值量具，供方需提出足以令人完全信服的理由。

w Gauging R&R studies are also done with attribute gauges.

计数型检具也进行R&R研究。

II.5.3

X

Gauge R & R is to conform with the guidelines in the AIAG Measurement Systems Analysis

w Gauge R&R studies are to be completed for all gauges used to check Ford product

Rate this

(MSA) manual. Whenever gauge R&R does not meet these guidelines, specific plans are in

regardless of type or measurement system.

sub-

place which adheres to the guideline. Additionally, the supplier has the appropriate

无论测量系统的类型是什么，用于检查福特产品的所有量具,都需进行量具再生/再现性

element by

measurement capability for all stages of production.

分析。

entering

Gage R & R与AIAG量测系统分析手册的指导要求相符一致。每当Gage R&R 不符合这些指导要

w Method and frequency of gauge R&R is specified for every measurement system,

r, y, or g in

求时，有特定的计划项目来证明会符合这些指导要求。另外，供方有不同生产阶段的适当的测量

including attribute gauge R&R.

cell above

能力。

每一个量测系统(包含计数值量具)的再生/再现性分析 (Gage R&R) 的操作方法和频率都

有明文规定。

w Supplier has evidence that any employee who uses a gauge follows the same

measurement processes for the gauge as the employees who participated in the

original gauge R&R study

供方有证据表明任何使用检具雇员遵循同样的测量过程，如最初参与R&R研究的雇员。

w Where AIAG MSA guidelines are not met, an improvement plan is available.

如果无法达到AIAG MSA的指导要求,则必须有改善计划。

Note:

It is recommended that gauge error be held within an acceptable level. gauges with an

error greater than 10% must be reviewed against the tolerance and associated risks

are evaluated.

注：在此建议测量误差应控制在可接受的水平之内。量测误差大于10%的，必须审核相

应的公差和风险关连评估。

Note:

Efforts must be made to conduct measurement correlation studies (i.e., a method of

inspection between the supplier and the receiving plant). Some of the gauges may

require isolators to reduce the impact of the manufacturing equipment vibration on the

measurement.

注：十分有必要实施量测关系分析(例如：某种在供方及验收场所间的检验方法)，有一

些量具可能需要隔离设备，以减少一些制造设备震动对量测的冲击。

II.5.4

Supplier has a documented "dropped / damaged gauge" policy that is followed by all employees.

This ensures that only functional, in-specification gauges are used.

供货商有明文的「废弃/损坏量具」规定，且所有员工必须遵守。这确保了仅有那些有功能又符合

规范的量具才会被使用。

23 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

AllResponsibility

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

t

b

D

i

g

Expectation期望

a

n

t

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

n

限

D

限

o

n

n

o

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

n

i

i

e

t

o

任

t

期

e

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

p

u

期

l

成

a

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

责

p

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

e

m

完

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

II.5.4

evidence

所有黄色和红

X

Supplier has a documented "dropped / damaged gauge" policy that is followed by all employees.

listed,

色期望要求由

w Operators know and understand the procedure

Rate this

This ensures that only functional, in-specification gauges are used.

作业员知道并理解这一程序。

sub-

供货商有明文的「废弃/损坏量具」规定，且所有员工必须遵守。这确保了仅有那些有功能又符合

w Records of dropped/damaged gauges are in compliance

element by

规范的量具才会被使用。

丢弃/损坏量具的记录相符合。

entering

r, y, or g in

cell above

II.5.5

Gauge masters are traceable to a national or international equivalent standard. Gauge

w Supplier has a gauge maintenance program.

calibration and maintenance is performed on an appropriate schedule and per specification.

供方有量具的维护计划

量具标准可追溯至符合国家标准或同等的国际标准。量具校准和维护按相应的日程安排表和规范

w Records show compliance. If supplier is using gauge blocks to qualify micrometers

实施。

and calipers, then they are certified to National Institute of Standards & Technology

(NIST) or international equivalent.

记录显示符合。若供方使用量块去校准千分尺和卡尺，则须要得到国家标准局/国家技

术标准研究院(NIST)，或同等国际性机构的验证。

II.5.6

X

Supplier conducts regular evaluation of error proofing devices.

w Evidence is recorded that error proofing devices are tested for all failure modes on

Rate this

供方实施防错设备评价规则。

the shop floor at a regular frequency (e.g., daily or at the start of each shift) to ensure

sub-they work.

element by

有记录的证据显示车间内使用的预防失效防错设备定期(例如，日或班前)被测试以确保

entering

防错设备有效。

r, y, or g in

cell above

w The frequency of checks should be set to correspond to the divisions between

homogeneous lots of production.

不同批次的生产之间的检查频次应设置。

INC

II.6. Control of Parts/Part Identification/Packaging/Shipping

II.6.1

X

Supplier has a documented process for positive part identification and part control in all stages of

w Supplier has controls and processes in place for handling rework, repair, and scrap,

Rate this

production, rework, repair, scrap, testing, laboratories, storage areas, office areas, etc.

which include documentation, evaluation, segregation, quarantine, disposition and

sub-

供方有书面的程序书显示如何在生产、返工、返修、报废、测试、实验室，储存区域、办公区域

recording.

element by等各个阶段，辨识合格零件。

供方有程序书和控制措施在运作中以处理返工，返修和报废品，此类措施包括：文件、

entering

评估、隔离、检疫、处置和记录。

r, y, or g in

w Work instructions for management of rework, repair, scrap, etc., have all of the

cell abovenecessary details, including quality acceptance criteria, process and product control

parameters, reference to product drawing release level and date, specific/special

gauges and tools required.

返工、返修、报废等作业指导书须有所有必需的说明，包括质量接收准则，过程和产品

控制参数，参考图纸的版本和日期、规范/特殊检具和工具要求。

w Applicable service processes should be followed regarding the re-use of parts if an

assembly is disassembled and re-assembled for any reason (e.g., rework).

若装配后被分解的再利用零件和任何原因的再装配(如返工)，可适用的服务过程应被跟

踪

w Supplier ensures that rework operation does not by-pass any quality operation

performed in the original process and assures that part conforms to customer

requirements.

供方确保返工作业不在原始过程被执行，保证零件满足顾客要求。

w Supplier has a process to evaluate if further traceability is required for reworked

components.

若返工零件需进一步的追溯，供方有过程去评价。

w Individual parts are identified for traceability, when and where feasible, including

segregation of reworked product.

当时间和地点可行时，为追溯目的，独立的零件被标识包括返工产品的隔离。

w Supplier has a process to ensure that the part is not reworked more than once for

the same issue.

供方有过程保证零件不被同样的问题返工一次以上。

w The supplier must have evidence that the process for marking of parts with their

part numbers (direct marking and labelling) is evaluated in the PFMEA and appropriate

actions taken as necessary

供方必须有证据表明带有零件号(直接标识和标签)的标识过程在PFMEA中被评价，当必

需时，采取适当的措施。

24 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

子

y

t

AllResponsibility

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

Expectations,and Due Date

b

D

i

g

Expectation期望

人

t

a

限

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

n

t

s

D

o

n

n

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

n

i

e

t

任

o

i

期

e

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

o

期

t

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

p

a

责

e

u

l

成

t

D

/

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

s

p

e

e

e

R

m

完

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

w Automated ID scanning systems must be subject to a Measurement System

Analysis to check for capability.

必须进行MSA分析以检查自动ID描扫系统的能力。

w Processes at suppliers and sub suppliers to be risk assessed for :-

- Potential for different parts to be mixed together.

- Potential for a part to be dispatched incomplete.

- Potential for assemblies to have wrong components fitted (mis-builds).

- Potential for a part to be dispatched under the wrong identity.

The whole production route (including all processing operations, rework/rectification,

storage and dispatch areas) is to be reviewed as part of the risk assessment.

供方和分供方为以下情况进行风险分析的过程：

--潜在的不同零件混在一起

--潜在的零件不全部被发送

--潜在的错误的零件被装配(错误制造)

--潜在的错误识别零件被发送

整个生产路线(包括所有生产作业，返工/纠正，储存，和发送区域)被评审做为风险评估

的一部分。

Note:

A good system should identify "where the part has been and where it is going."

Everything has its place identified and it must be in its place. (All parts outside of a

production area (i.e., offices, labs, testing etc.) must have identification tag).

注：一套良好的系统应该识别「零件从哪里来、到哪里去」。所有的东西都可以识别，

并各就其规定的位置就绪。（例如：所有非生产区域的零件（例如：办公室、实验室、

测试间等）都必须有识别标签）。

II.6.2

X

Supplier has lot traceability of product shipped to Ford, including reworked product.

w Where supplier has a lot traceability system in operation, system is capable

Rate this

供方设有产品装运到福特后的批次追踪的能力，包括返工产品。

communicating information to Ford, as required.

sub-

供方有在流程中对各零件批量做追踪的能力,当被要求时,其系统要有能力将相关信息传

element by

递至福特。

entering

r, y, or g in

cell above

II.6.3

X

Supplier takes measures to ensure that production processes control handling, storage, and

w All aspects of part handling throughout the production process should be monitored

Rate this

packaging as to prevent damage or deterioration, and preserve product quality.

for the occurrence of handling or storage damage. There should be documented

sub-

供方采取措施确保产品制程控制搬运，储存，和包装以防止损坏或腐蚀，并保持产品质量。

analysis and corrective action plans to eliminate the cause of functional defects.

element by

生产制程上每一项处理零件的环节需能监控，以侦测出任何零件在制程中因处理、或贮

entering

存不当产生的损坏。须有文件化的分析及矫正措施计划，以消除任何造成不良的原因。

r, y, or g in

cell above

w Supplier has documented involvement in package design and testing, and

improvements are being made to ensure product quality

供方有相关书面文件显示其对包装设计和测试的参与，并有做出改进以确保产品质量。

w Should supplier have responsibility for maintaining returnable dunnage, there is a

process for reviewing internal and external transportation bins for structural damage

and holes. (Potential for Hi-Lo forks causing product damage.)

供方有责任维护可重复使用的料架，并有一定的程序审核内部和外部的运输货柜避免结

构损坏和漏洞。（可能因推高机导致的产品损坏）。

w Supplier should define the disposition of parts that are dropped in the course of

production

供方应定义在生产过程中坠落零件的处置。

w Where stacking standards exist, the supplier should define the acceptance

standard for any stacking of components.

当堆高标准存在，供方应定义任何零件堆高的接收标准。

w Supplier has a process for reviewing storage areas all environmental and adverse

conditions are considered in the entire design of packaging and facilities.

供方有过程审核储存区所有的环境，并且有考虑到整体包装设计及设备的不利状况。

w Returnable Ford dunnage is appropriately maintained and cleaned, if supplier

responsible. Measures are taken to repair or replace worn or broken dunnage.

可返回再用的福特料架要得到适当的维护和清洁。若为供方的负责，要采取措施修理或

替换已磨损或断裂的料架。

II.6.4

Supplier follows Ford packaging requirements (Form 150 - North America; Form EU1121 -

Europe). At pack-out, the Ford packaging guidelines are available for use and followed as

required.

供方遵守福特包装要求(北美 表格150；欧洲 表格EU1121)。在包装时，福特包装指南可获得并

25 of 30

被遵守。

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

e

期

子

证据

(Action Plan,

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

AllResponsibility

b

D

t

i

g

Expectation期望

a

n

Expectations,and Due Date

s

人

n

限

t

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

D

限

o

n

n

n

o

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

i

o

任

t

期

i

e

t

e

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

p

u

期

l

成

a

t

D

c

e

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

责

p

l

e

m

完

/

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

II.6.4

evidence

所有黄色和红

X

Supplier follows Ford packaging requirements (Form 150 - North America; Form EU1121 -

listed,

色期望要求由

w Supplier dunnage is Ford approved and documented.

Rate this

Europe). At pack-out, the Ford packaging guidelines are available for use and followed as

供方的料架有经过福特批准并有书面纪录。

sub-

required.

w Supplier complies with MMOG/LE requirement. Results are available.

element by

供方遵守福特包装要求(北美 表格150；欧洲 表格EU1121)。在包装时，福特包装指南可获得并

供方遵循MMOG/LE要求，并有结果备查。

entering

被遵守。

r, y, or g in

w "Ford Plant Specific" packaging instructions are posted, when required.

在需要的时候，张贴「福特工厂规定」包装作业指导书。

cell above

INC

II.7 Testing/Engineering Specifications

II.7.1

X

All inspections, measurements, and tests, including Engineering Specifications (ES) and Material

w Supplier has a documented process in place to ensure that the latest Engineering

Rate this

Specifications (MS), are performed according to documented control plans, instructions, and/or

Specifications (ES) are accessible (ED, SDS, MS, etc.)

sub-

procedures to ensure product requirements are met.

供方有书面化的程序在运作中来确保最新工程规范(ES)的取得(ED, SDS, MS等等..)。

element by

所有的检验，测量，和测试，包括工程规范(ES)和材料规格(MS)，都根据书面的控制计划，作业

entering

指导书，和/或执行程序以确保满足产品要求。

w Supplier complies with all blueprint and/or engineering specification requirements

r, y, or g in

(ES, SDS, MS, etc.)

cell above

供方符合所有的蓝图和/或工程规范要求(ES, SDS, MS, 等)。

II.7.2

Appropriate reaction plans address what actions should take place if there is a test or inspection

w Supplier has an engineering specification (ES) failure procedure.

failure, and includes product containment and customer notification policy for all events.

供方有工程规范(ES)失效的处理程序。

有适当的反应计划指示在测试或检查不通过时将采取何种行动.这包括了在各种状况下的产品补救

w Reaction plans include directions on who is to act, if production is to stop, what

措施和通知顾客政策。

shipments are to stop or to be recalled, and what actions are deemed necessary to

protect and notify Ford.

应对计划包括生产停止时谁来应对，如果生产必须停止，哪些出货应该停止或召回，以

及需要采取什么措施保护和通知福特。

II.7.3

X

Suppliers and sub-suppliers providing heat-treated components are required to meet Ford

w Supplier can verify that a valid heat treat system assessment exists, for all heat treated

Rate this

Manufacturing Standard W-HTX and meet the requirements of CQI-9 Special Process: Heat

components and all requirements are met. W-HTX is the Ford manufacturing standard

sub-

Treat System Assessment. To reduce the risk of embrittlement, heat-treated steel components

to control heat-treating processes and auxiliary equipment. This includes: Process

element by

are required to conform with Ford material specification WSS-M99A3-A.

Monitoring Test Frequencies, Laboratory Control Test Frequencies, In-process Test

entering

The tier 1 supplier is responsible to ensure that all tiers of heat treat suppliers are annually

Frequencies, and the minimum requirements for each heat treat process type defined

r, y, or g in

assessed to CQI-9.

within W-HTX

cell above

提供热处理零件的供方和分供方需要满足福特的制造衡量指针W-HTX并满足CQI-9特殊过程：过

供方可以验证其针对经过热处理的部件的检测系统为有效的。W-HTX是福特管理热处

处理评价系统。为了减少变脆的风险，热处理的钢零件需要遵守福特材料规格WSS-M99A3-A。

理过程和辅助设备的制造标准。包括：制程测试频率，和W-HTX定义的每一热处理过

1级供方有责任保证所有级别的热处理供方每年按CQI-9评价。

程类型的最小要求。

w The CQI-9 Special Process: Heat Treat System Assessment is to be used to assess

all heat treat processes annually, regardless of tier level, and each item in the

assessment is to be rated one of the following:

w "Satisfactory", if the requirements are met,

w "Not Satisfactory" if the requirements are not met or

w "Needs Immediate Action" if a non conforming product is suspected or found.

If there are any "Not Satisfactory" or "Needs Immediate Action" findings, corrective

action plans are to be developed and implemented within 90 days. "Needs Immediate

Action" requires containment.

See /sta/ (heat treat section) on Ford Supplier Portal for the

requirements.

CQI-9特殊过程：热处理评价系统用于年度评价所有热处理过程，无论级别如何，评价

中每一项目与以下其中一条相对应：

♦

"满足”，若满足要求

♦“不满足”，若未满足要求可

♦“需立即改进”，若不合格品被隔良或发现。

若任何“不满足”或“需立即改进”发现，在90天提出纠正改进措施。“需立即改进”要求围堵

。

参考 /sta/ (heat treat section) on Ford Supplier Portal for the requirements.

INC

II.8 Preventive Maintenance (PM) / Housekeeping

II.8.1

X

Supplier has instituted practices that include reactive, preventive, and predictive maintenance.

w Supplier has a process in place to improve the management, maintenance, and life-

Rate this

The maintenance system supports process capability improvement.

cycle of equipment and tooling.

sub-

供货商有一套维护系统包括应对，预防性的，和预见性的维护。维护体系支持制程能力的提高。

供方有一套程序在运作中，来改善设备和模具的管理，维护和寿命周期。

element by

entering

r, y, or g in

cell above

26 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

证据

(Action Plan,

e

期

子

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

Expectation期望

AllResponsibility

i

l

i

e

&

t

b

D

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

Expectations,and Due Date

i

g

a

n

t

s

人

n

限

D

限

o

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

o

n

n

i

n

i

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

o

任

t

期

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

i

e

t

t

p

a

m

a

R

责

e

u

期

l

成

s

D

p

t

c

e

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

Color Rating,yellow and red

e

m

完

/

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

Supplier has instituted practices that include reactive, preventive, and predictive maintenance.

shall haverated

C

Rate this

x

是/。

E

u

S

The maintenance system supports process capability improvement.

documentedExpectations)

sub-

供货商有一套维护系统包括应对，预防性的，和预见性的维护。维护体系支持制程能力的提高。

evidence

所有黄色和红

element by

listed,

色期望要求由

w Supplier's maintenance program includes a process for reviewing manufacturing

entering

equipment and material handling systems (e.g., guards, conveyor belts, etc.)

r, y, or g in

供方的维护计划包括：审核生产设备和材料处理系统的程序（例如：防护装置、输送带

cell above

等）。

w The supplier ensures that PM is conducted according to the schedule for all

processes that impact all part characteristics, especially SCs and CCs.

供方确保PM按计划执行，该计划针对那些影响所有零件特性尤其SCs和CCs的所有过

程

w Supplier's maintenance department tracks unscheduled downtime versus scheduled

downtime, and develops improvement actions to eliminate causes of unscheduled

downtime

供方的维护部门追踪非计划停机和计划内停机，并提出改进计划来消除非计划停机的原

因。

w Lessons from events due to unscheduled downtime are incorporated into the

scheduled maintenance program to improve OEE.

非计划停机事件所获的教训，被编入维护日程安排计划，以改进设备整体效率(OEE)的

能力。

w The maintenance schedule has specific responsibilities assigned.

保养计划有指定责任人。

w Supplier's predictive maintenance is based on valid statistical methods.

供方的预测性保养是建立在有效统计手法的基础上。

II.8.2

Management regularly reviews (at least quarterly) the status of the PM completion to plan.

w There are minutes of management meetings related to the PM program.

Management reviews corrective action plans to ensure any backlog (past due) maintenance has

有关于PM计划的管理层会议记录。

a plan to become current to the PM schedule. Management undertakes an evaluation to

w Trend/performance charts demonstrate effectiveness of PM program (i.e., up-time

determine if there is a reduction of machine/process downtime.

trend)

管理人员定期审核（至少每积压季一次）PM按计划完成的情况。管理人员审查校正行动计划，

趋势/表现图标显示PM计划的有效性（例如，随时间的发展趋势）。

以确保积压未完(逾期)的维护事项列入目前PM计划的事项。管理阶层进行评估，以决定是否有减

少机器/制程停机时间。

w New failure modes and causes identified from the PM program that affect part quality

(scheduled or unscheduled) have been looped back to the product's PFMEA, control

plans, and work instructions.

PM计划中识别出新的影响零件质量的失效模式和原因(计划内或非计划)有回归到产品的

PFMEA, 控制计划, 和作业指导书。

II.8.3

X

The supplier has continuous improvement plans for plant cleanliness, housekeeping,

w There is a documented procedure for plant cleanliness, housekeeping, and labor

Rate this

ergonomics, and working conditions, and audits their facility at least monthly. There is evidence

conditions as mandated by local law and customer expectations.

sub-

that the supplier management team is following continuous improvement plans.

有书面化的程序针对工厂的清洁和整理和当地法律强制和顾客要求的劳动条件。

element by

供方针对工厂的清洁、整理、人体工学、和工作条件有持续不断的改进计划，并至少每月一次稽

entering查他们的设备。有证据表明供方管理其团队正追踪持续不断的改进计划。

w There is adequate lighting for inspection, measuring, and test equipment

r, y, or g in有足够的照明用于检查，测量，和设备测试。

cell above

w Supplier's QOS has safety as one of the metrics

供方的QOS将安全作为指标之一。

w Supplier's QOS tracks injuries related to ergonomic issues

供方的QOS追踪与人体工学有关的伤害事件。

w Supplier has a process in place to assess physical and chemical risk to workers as

well as appropriate health and safety measures in place to mitigate risk.

供方有过程评价工人的物理和化学风险，也适当测量健康和安全以减少风险。

w Emergency systems are in place and well communicated to employees.

紧急系统沟通到每一雇员。

II.8.4

X

Supplier takes measures to minimize foreign material, chips, debris, contamination, excessive oil,

w Supplier has a process to review manufacturing / repair / rework processing and

Rate this

etc. where part quality can be negatively affected.

shipping areas for "any" potential to contaminate or damage finished parts, including

sub-

供方采取措施减少无关的材料，碎片，杂质，灰尘，过度的油污等。这些都会负面影响零件的质

the dunnage prior to shipping to customer plant(s) (e.g., finished machined parts,

element by量。bearings, seals/gaskets, brakes, fuel and power steering lines, hoses, etc. cannot

enteringaccept "any" contamination. Contamination in the raw materials for injection molded

r, y, or g inand powdered metal components can impact product quality and performance.).

cell above

供方有过程评审制造/返修/返工过程，和装运地点，以避免「任何」潜在的污染或损伤

成品的机会，包括装运到顾客工厂之前的栈板（例如：加工完成的零件、轴承、密封胶

/垫圈、支架、加油和动力转向控制导线、软管等，不能允许「任何」的污染。原材料

在射出成型和粉末冶金零件的污染，可能影响产品质量和性能）。

w Where supplier identifies areas of concerns, actions plans are developed to

implement improvements, and closure of issues is documented.

当供方发现有问题的地方，制定行动计划实施改进，已结案的问题文件化。

27 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

e

期

子

证据

(Action Plan,

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

l

i

e

&

AllResponsibility

b

D

t

i

g

Expectation期望

a

n

Expectations,and Due Date

人

n

限

t

s

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

D

限

o

n

n

n

任

o

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

i

期

i

e

t

o

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

t

p

a

责

e

u

期

l

成

t

D

c

e

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

p

e

m

完

/

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

E

u

是/。

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

INC

II.9 Manufacturing Flow / Process Engineering / 6 Sigma and Lean Manufacturing Metrics

II.9.1

X

Supplier uses lean manufacturing and Six-Sigma principles for current and new model parts

Supplier is driving continuous improvement utilizing JIT production principles listed

Rate this

incorporating JIT (just in time production), waste elimination, and team based structured problem

below:

sub-

solving to drive continuous improvement for quality, process capability, and manufacturing

供方利用下列的JIT生产原则来推动持续不断的改善。

element by

efficiency.

entering

供方针对现有零件及新车型零件，应用精益生产、6 个标准偏差的原则，融入当前生产和新型合

w Continuous flow processing, one piece flow or controlled batch size.

r, y, or g in

连续流动的制程、一个流或是控制批量。

作的零件(JIT生产)、消除浪费，并以团队导向的问题解决手法，推动持续不断的提升质量、制程

cell above

能力及制造效率。

w Supplier only produces to customer demand (Takt).

供方按顾客的需求(节拍,Takt)来生产。

w Supplier produces to replenishment Pull signal.

供方按拉动式生产的原则来生产。

w Supplier controls batch size by lowering changeover time (SMED).

供方应控制批量，并尽可能的去降低换模时间。

w Lean principles and Six Sigma are integrated into corporate objectives.

精实生产及六个标准偏差被整合至公司的策略目标。

Supplier is driving continuous improvement by utilizing automation principles listed

below:

供方利用下列的自动生产原则来驱动持续不断的改善:

w A system that stops the process when defects are detected.

侦测到不良时，可停止制程的系统。

w Rapid supervisor alert, a signal that a defect has been detected.

侦测到不良时会发出讯号的快速监督警告。

w High intensity use of error-proofing (poke yoke).

大量的运用防错法(poke-yoke)。

Supplier is driving continuous improvement by utilizing flexible labor process and system

principles listed below:

供方利用下列弹性劳动力的运用流程及系统策略，来驱动持续不断的改善:

w Flexible machine/cell design. Machines that provide maximum efficiency and

flexibility.

弹性的机器/作业组设计, 让机器提供最大的效率及弹性。

w Cell combination: Multiple product cell maximizing labor efficiency.

复合件组立：对于复杂的组立件，要发挥最高的效率。

Supplier drives continuous improvement by utilizing planned and structured workstation

and cell Kaizan principles listed below:

供方利用下列有计划及组织的作业站及作业组改善原则，来驱动持续不断的改善:

w Line side, metrics based problem resolution with team leaders. Operators and team

leaders improve effectiveness of work cell.

生产线对问题解决得作法是要与领队共同进行。作业员与队长共同有效的改善所有的工

作效率。

w Structured workstation-level improvement activity: Operators and team leaders

improve effectiveness of work cell.

建立作业站层级改善活动的系统：作业员和团队的领队们一起改善作业组的效率。

w Structured cell-level improvement activity: A system that encourages metrics based

continuous improvement actions and recognizes employee contributions.

建立作业站层级改善活动的系统：有一个系统鼓励以衡量指数为根据的持续改善行动，

并奖励员工的贡献。

w Employee recognition program: A system that encourages continuous improvement

actions and recognizes employee contributions.

员工奖励计划:有一个系统可以鼓励持续改善行动并奖励员工贡献。

II.9.2

X

Supplier includes key manufacturing and Six-Sigma-type measurables within its QOS. A

w Supplier understands and uses lean and Six Sigma metrics

Rate this

minimum of two lean- and one Six Sigma-type measurables show trends or history of

供方理解并运用精实生产及六个标准偏差衡量指标。

sub-

improvement in the past six months. Lean and Six Sigma measurables include some of the

element by

following: First Time Through (FTT), Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), Dock to Dock

w Supplier uses lean manufacturing and Six Sigma principles to eliminate waste and to

entering

(DTD), Percent Value Add (PVA) and Cpk.

manage its production, and is comparable to Ford's specified lean and Six Sigma

r, y, or g in

供方的QOS系统包括有关键的生产和6个标准偏差类型的衡量指标。至少要有两个精益生产衡量

metrics.

供方运用精实生产及六个标准偏差的原则，减少浪费及管理其生产，并符合福特特定的

cell above

指标和一个6个标准偏差衡量指针来显示过去六个月内制程改进的趋势或履历。精益生产和6个标

精实生产及六个标准偏差衡量指标。

准偏差的衡量指标包括了：码头至码头(DTD)、一次通过率(FTT)、设备总效率(OEE)、增值百分

w Lean and Six Sigma metrics are used to drive improvement and process variability

比(PVA)和Cpk。

reduction.

精实生产及六个标准偏差衡量指针被用来驱动改善及减少制程的变异。

Note:

For more information and/or training, refer to the Lean Resource Center web page:

/

注: 更多的相关资料和/或训练，请参见精实资源中心网页：/

28 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

Supplier includes key manufacturing and Six-Sigma-type measurables within its QOS. A

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Rate this

minimum of two lean- and one Six Sigma-type measurables show trends or history of

sub-

Supplier Site Code

improvement in the past six months. Lean and Six Sigma measurables include some of the

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

element by

Supplier Contact Name

following: First Time Through (FTT), Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), Dock to Dock

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

entering

Supplier Contact Phone#

(DTD), Percent Value Add (PVA) and Cpk.

供方联络电话

:

r, y, or g in

供方的QOS系统包括有关键的生产和6个标准偏差类型的衡量指标。至少要有两个精益生产衡量

cell above

Comments /

&

素

指标和一个6个标准偏差衡量指针来显示过去六个月内制程改进的趋势或履历。精益生产和6个标

Action Plan纠

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

期

子

准偏差的衡量指标包括了：码头至码头(DTD)、一次通过率(FTT)、设备总效率(OEE)、增值百分

证据

(Action Plan,

e

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

比(PVA)和Cpk。

t

a

e

&

Expectation期望

AllResponsibility

i

l

i

b

D

g

n

t

n

人

t

a

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

Expectations,and Due Date

i

s

n

限

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

o

n

t

n

任

D

限

o

i

i

e

a

t

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

t

期

o

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

p

责

e

e

u

期

l

成

a

m

R

t

D

c

e

l

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

p

e

m

完

/

e

e

p

-

shall haverated

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

x

b

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

C

是/。

evidence

所有黄色和红

listed,

色期望要求由

INC

II.10 Problem Solving/Corrective Actions

II.10.1

X

Supplier uses a structured problem solving method (e.g., Global 8D) to address customer

w Supplier has a documented problem solving methodology.

Rate this

concerns and complaints.

供方文件化的问题解决手法。

sub-

供方运用有组织的解决问题方法，（例如，全球8D）来处理顾客关心的问题和抱怨。

element by

w Supplier has clearly described systemic root cause and corrective actions, which can

entering

be found in the actual process, work instructions, control plans, or procedures

r, y, or g in

供方有清楚的陈述系统性问题的根本原因及相应的校正行动措施。 而这些措施可以在

cell above

实际流程，作业指导书,控制计划或程序上看到。

w There is a linkage to FMEAs and control plans.

FMEAs和控制计划有相联系。

w Supplier uses Six Sigma and 8D principles and all of the appropriate statistical quality

tools to identify root cause.

供方运用六个标准偏差和8D原则及所有的适用的统计质量工具，以鉴别根本原因。

w Supplier shows evidence that Six Sigma metrics and 8Ds are driving to systemic

resolutions, and tracked and closed with Ford assembly plants on a timely basis.

供方有证据显示六个标准偏差及8D手法推动至系统性的问题解决上，并与福特装配工

厂定期一起追踪进度和结案。

w Work force is trained in problem-solving methodologies (e.g., Global 8D, Six Sigma

Green Belt/Black Belt)

员工有接受解决问题手法的培训(例如,全球8D,六个标准偏差绿带/黑带)。

w Supplier tracks internal quality issues, utilizing 6 Sigma DMAIC or 8D problem-solving

methodology.

供方运用六个标准偏差DMAIC或8D的解决问题手法来追踪内部质量问题。

w Supplier reviews pareto charts (or other analysis tool) of recent problems and

implements 6 Sigma project based error-proofing, where applicable.

供方运用柏拉图(或其他分析工具)检视目前的问题，如果可行的话，执行六个标准偏差

项目中的防错法。

Note:

Prioritization should be based on importance to the customer as defined by CTQ.

注:顾客定义的关键质量特性(CTQ)的重要程度决定了实施的优先次序。

II.10.2

X

Methods are established to communicate quality concerns to the supplier's production and

w Supplier has a procedure to communicate corrective actions and process

Rate this

support personnel. Corrective actions are submitted to the supplier's management team for

improvements resulting from problem solving efforts within its organization and to

sub-

review. The corrective actions are communicated to, and replicated in all affected areas in the

similar areas.

element by

supplier's organization.

供方有一套程序书，将用问题解决手法导出的校正行动及制程改善的作为，在组织内传

entering

建立供方生产和支持人员能沟通质量问题的方法。向供方的管理团队提供纠正措施以供审核。将达以及用到类似的领域。

r, y, or g in纠正措施传达到供方组织内各相关的部门。

w CTQ Customer complaints are communicated to operators.

cell above

关键质量(CTQ)的顾客抱怨有传达至作业员。

w Supplier includes appropriate production operators as part of the problem solving

team

供货商将相关的作业员纳入为问题解决小组的一份子。

w There is a process to capture lessons learned

有过程捕获经验总结。

w Lessons learned are built back into the work instructions and procedures

经验总结反馈回作业指导书和程序。

w Lessons learned are incorporated in the current and new programs

经验总结被整合入目前的和新的计划。

w Supplier takes lessons learned and incorporates them into all similar processes.

供方将经验总结融合运用到所有其他类似的流程。

II.10.3

X

Supplier has a process in place to address customer plant concerns in a timely and thorough

w If supplier's Q1 endorsement has been rescinded by a Ford customer plant based on

Rate this

manner.

the supplier demonstrated QR trend or 3MIS warranty R/1000 and CPU performance,

sub-

供方须有一套运作中的程序，能及时和彻底的方法对应顾客工厂方关心的问题。

the supplier has submitted a CAP (corrective action plan) to STA within 30 days

element byaddressing the underlying root cause.

entering

如果供方Q1背书(endorsement)被福特顾客厂基于QR趋势或3MIS索赔R/1000和CPU等

r, y, or g in

表现而撤回,而供方须在30天内针对根本原因向STA提出校正行动计划。

cell above

Note:

Failure to do so may represent a 'violation of trust' and trigger a Q1 recommend

revoke signal in SIM.

注:如没做到如上所述,等同"违反诚信原则(Violation of Trust)" 并自动启动SIM中建议Q1

除权的信息

29 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008

FORD PROPRIETARY

Contact: (siminfo@)

Q1 Manufacturing Site Assessment Evaluation Matrix

Date

日期

:

Supplier Contact E

STA Site Engineer nameSTA

供方联络

E-Mail:

现场工程师姓名

:

Supplier Name

供方名称

:STA Site Engineer E-Mail

现场工程师

E-Mail:

Supplier Site Code

供方现场代码

:

If Supplier Self-AsSTA Site Engineer Phone#

若供方自评，批准人现场工程师电话

::

Supplier Contact Name

供方联络人

:

Name

名字

:

Commodities

商品

:

Supplier Contact Phone#

供方联络电话

:

Comments /

Action Plan纠

&

素

望

要

Evidence 注释/

正措施

e

期

子

证据

(Action Plan,

y

t

Expectation Guidelines期望指南

t

a

i

l

i

&

AllResponsibility

b

e

D

g

Expectation期望

t

i

n

t

人

a

n

限

n

n

Expectations,and Due Date

s

D

限

o

Note: The Expectation Guidelines listed below are not to be considered all-inclusive.

i

Supplier must list evidence to support each Expectation.

o

n

任

i

期

i

e

t

t

m

a

R

(*Denotes Focus Area)

regardless ofRequired for all

o

t

e

e

Refer to the AIAG Manuals to ensure compliance. The AIAG website is:

p

a

u

期

l

成

t

c

e

供方必须提供证据来支持（＊符号表示特殊区域）

Color Rating,yellow and red

s

责

D

p

l

e

m

完

/

e

e

R

o

注释：下面所列的期望指南不用所有的都考虑，参考AIAG手册确保符合，AIAG网站

p

-

b

shall haverated

C

x

是/。

E

u

S

documentedExpectations)

evidence

所有黄色和红

II.10.4

listed,

色期望要求由

X

Supplier reviews previous launches and incorporates lessons learned in future launch plans to

w Supplier reviews its previous launches with Ford PD, VO, and STA, utilizing an 8-D

Rate this

achieve flawless launch.

process to address issues.

sub-

供方评审过去开发的产品，总结教训并将相关经验运用到未来新产品的开发以达到无瑕疵的量产

供方和福特PD、 VO和STA评审之前开发的产品问题，并运用8-D程序处理问题。

element by。

entering

w PD lessons learned are formalized within the supplier's design development system.

r, y, or g in

产品开发的正式的经验总结到供方的设计开发系统中。

cell above

w Supplier has a system in place to capture and archive lessons learned.

供方有在运作中的的系统，负责撷取经验总结及列入数据库。

w Supplier develops and implements agreed-upon work plans to assure successful

launches going forward.

供方发展并执行大家同意的工作计划，确保成功的开发计划得以持续。

30 of 30

Date Created: 11/20/02

Revision Date: 3rd January 2008