2024年3月16日发(作者:)
Great Britain was the world's foremost power during the 18th, 19th and early
20th centuries. Until the Suez crisis of 1956, the country was considered a
'superpower'. After 1956 however, with the loss of the empire, its dominant role in
global affairs was gradually diminished
1、 colonial expansion 16
th
century 殖民扩张
British foreign relations since 1600 have focused on achieving a balance of
power, with no country controlling the continent of Europe. The chief enemy, from
the Hundred Years' War until the defeat of Napoleon (1337-1815) was France, a
larger country with a more powerful army. The British were generally successful in
their many wars, with the notable exception of the American War of Independence
(1775–1783), when Britain, without any major allies, was defeated by the colonials
who had the support of France, the Netherlands and Spain. A favored diplomatic
strategy was subsidizing the armies of continental allies, such as Prussia, thereby
turning London's enormous financial power to military advantage. Britain relied
heavily on its Royal Navy for security, seeking to keep it the most powerful fleet
afloat with a full complement of bases across the globe.
The British built up a very large worldwide British Empire, which peaked in size
in the 1920-40 era and in wealth around 1900, then began to shrink until by the
1970s almost nothing was left but a "Commonwealth of Nations" that had little to
do.[2] Britain finally turned its attention to the continent, joining the European
Union.[3]
After 1900 Britain ended its "splendid isolation" by developing friendly
relations with the United States and Japan 1902. Even more important—by
forming the Triple Entente with France (1904) and Russia (1907), thus forging the
anti-German alliance that fought the First World War (1914-1918). The "special
relationship" with the U.S. endured. It played a pivotal role in the Second World
War and the Cold War, and is in effect today through NATO. By 2014, however, the
debate was underway whether Britain should reduce or cut its ties with the EU, and
whether Scotland should leave the UK.[
2、splendid isolation WW1大陆均势
Splendid isolation is the foreign policy pursued by Great Britain during the
late 19th century, especially under the Conservative Party premierships of
Benjamin Disraeli and the Marquess of Salisbury.
[1]
The term was coined by a
Canadian politician to praise Britain's minimal involvement in European affairs.
There has been much debate among historians as to whether this policy was
intentional or forced on Britain by contemporary events. Some historians, such as
John Charmley, have argued that splendid isolation was a fiction for the period
prior to the Franco-Russian Alliance of 1892, and that the policy was reluctantly
pursued thereafter.
[2]
The Earl of Derby enunciated the policy in 1866 when he was
foreign minister:
it is the duty of the Government of this country, placed as it is with regard to
geographical position, to keep itself upon terms of goodwill with all surrounding
nations, but not to entangle itself with any single or monopolizing alliance with
any one of them; above all to endeavor not to interfere needlessly and vexatiously
with the internal affairs of any foreign country."
[2][3]
Background: During the late 19th century, Britain's primary goal in foreign
policy was to maintain the balance of power in Europe and to intervene should
that balance be upset. Its secondary goal was to protect its overseas interest in the
colonies and dominions, as free trade was what kept the Empire alive. The sea
routes to the colonies, especially those linking Britain to India (via the Suez Canal),
were vital.
The policy of 'Splendid Isolation' is perceived to have been characterized by a
reluctance to enter into permanent European alliances or commitments with the
other Great powers and by an increase in the importance given to British colonies,
protectorates and dependencies overseas in an era of increasing competition in
the wider world, a situation relatively unknown since Britain's conflicts with France
during the eighteenth century.
Abandonment of this policy
Some historians argue that Britain's isolation was formally ended by the 1902
Anglo-Japanese Alliance. However this is disputed by T.G. Otte, who argues that
the Anglo-Japanese Alliance actually reinforced Britain's aloofness from the
continent and the European alliance systems.
[9]
Britain began to normalize its
relations with European countries that it had disputes with, and the
Entente
cordiale
and the Anglo-Russian Entente were signed in 1904 and 1907 respectively.
The Alliance System was finally formed in the same year as the Triple Alliance and
Triple Entente, and is considered an important factor in the outbreak of World War
I.
[10]
3、allied powers 协约国一战时
4、splendid isolation
5、Policy of Appeasement WW2 绥靖主义
On 1 September 1939, German forces invaded Poland; Britain and France
joined the war against Germany. Chamberlain's conduct of the war was not
popular and, on 10 May 1940, Winston Churchill became Prime Minister. In July,
some politicians inside and outside the government were still willing to consider
Hitler's peace offer, but Churchill would not.[13] Chamberlain died on 9 November
the same year. Churchill delivered a tribute to him in which he said, "Whatever else
history may or may not say about these terrible, tremendous years, we can be sure
that Neville Chamberlain acted with perfect sincerity according to his lights and
strove to the utmost of his capacity and authority, which were powerful, to save the
world from the awful, devastating struggle in which we are now engaged." [14]
After 1945 Britain systematically reduced its overseas commitments.
Practically all the colonies became independent. Britain reduced its involvements
in the Middle east, with the humiliating Suez Crisis of 1956 marking the end of its
status as a superpower. However Britain did forge close military ties with the
United States, and with traditional foes such as France and Germany, in the NATO
military alliance. After years of debate (and rebuffs), Britain joined the Common
Market in 1973; it is now the European Union.[6] However it did not merge
financially, and kept the pound separate from the Euro, which kept it partly
isolated from the EU financial crisis of 2011.[7]
6、Three Circle Diplomacy:三环外交 1948
7、Iron curtain policy 铁幕政策 1946
The Iron Curtain symbolized the ideological conflict and physical boundary
dividing Europe into two separate areas from the end of World War II in 1945 until
the end of the Cold War in 1991. The term symbolized efforts by the Soviet Union
to block itself and its satellite states from open contact with the west and
non-Soviet-controlled areas. On the east side of the Iron Curtain were the
countries that were connected to or influenced by the Soviet Union. On either side
of the Iron Curtain, states developed their own international economic and military
alliances:
Member countries of the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance and the
Warsaw Pact, with the Soviet Union as the leading state
Member countries of the European Community and/or the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization and with the United States as the leading country
Following a period of economic and political stagnation under Brezhnev and
his immediate successors, the Soviet Union decreased its intervention in Eastern
Bloc politics. Mikhail Gorbachev (General Secretary from 1985) decreased
adherence to the Brezhnev Doctrine,[70] which held that if socialism were
threatened in any state then other socialist governments had an obligation to
intervene to preserve it, in favor of the "Sinatra Doctrine". He also initiated the
policies of glasnost (openness) and perestroika (economic restructuring). A wave
of Revolutions occurred throughout the Eastern Bloc in 1989.
8、splendid isolation policy made a comeback in the British media in 2011,
when UK Prime Minister David Cameron refused to back a deal to rescue the euro
zone.[苏伊士] The EU plan for the banks was aimed to solve the European
sovereign-debt crisis, by amending the EU treaties, which included the EU financial
transaction tax. It would have cost Britain an estimated £26 billion a year. The veto
was welcomed by Conservative MPs who support the traditional Tory stance of
"splendid isolation" in Europe, and advocate financial independence to regulate its
own financial market.
9、Gunboat diplomacy 炮舰外交
The Second Anglo-Burmese War; 缅因战争 5 April 1852 – 20 December 1852)
was the second of the three wars fought between the Burmese and British forces
during the 19th century, with the outcome of the gradual extinction of Burmese
sovereignty and independence;
The Second Opium War, was a war pitting the British Empire and the Second
French Empire against the Qing dynasty of China, lasting from 1856 to 1860. It was
fought over similar issues as the First Opium War.
补充:WW1 1914 - Again highlighted the fact that Britain was going to lose
superpower status because of other countries had better economies, that were
growing faster, they had higher standard of living, better health and a more
educated nation.
Prince George, son of Britain's Prince William and his wife Catherine, Duchess
of Cambridge has caught the attention of the world and led a trend of
"diaper diplomacy
1
" during his first foreign visit to New Zealand and Australia.
The trip also reminds the public of his father's first appearance in Oceania more
than 30 years ago
乔治小王子——英国威廉王子和妻子凯瑟琳(剑桥公爵夫人)所生的儿子——首次海
外出访,在新西兰和澳大利亚率先开展“尿布外交”,引来全球瞩目。这次出访让公众回
忆起30多年前威廉小小年纪随父母访问新西兰。
许多媒体将乔治小王子的这次访问定名为diaper diplomacy ——“尿布外交”,足
见小王子的人气甚至超过了父母。小王子抵达新西兰当天天气条件恶劣,因此小王子错过
了famed Maori welcoming ceremony(著名的毛利人欢迎仪式)。不过小王子的父母和
毛利人长者举行了nose-touching ceremony(碰鼻礼)。
小王子的母亲凯特王妃当天身穿buttoned-up red coat(红色双排扣外套),头戴同
色系pillbox hat(平顶小圆帽),别着silver fern brooch(银蕨形胸针),抱着小王子走
下飞机。这枚胸针是伊丽莎白二世60年前访问新西兰时收到的礼物,silver fern(银蕨)
是新西兰特有的植物,是新西兰的标志。
Issue
The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is highly important to the UK. Since
2011, the region has experienced major changes, driven by the political and
economic demands of citizens of the region for more inclusive, democratic
societies with a fair prospect of employment. MENA is also home to some of
the most long-running and high-profile foreign policy issues in the world,
including the current Syria crisis. MENA matters for our prosperity, too. Trade
between the UK and MENA exceeded £30 billion in 2011, and millions of
British tourists visit the region each year. Actions
Response to the Arab Spring: the Arab Partnership
Through the Arab Partnership (AP), a joint Foreign & Commonwealth Office
and Department for International Development (DFID) initiative, the government
is supporting political and economic reform in the Middle East and North Africa
region, to build a more inclusive, accountable MENA region. The AP includes
diplomatic support for political reform, a £110 million bilateral fund to finance
locally-led reform projects, and influencing work through multilateral
organisations, including the European Union, World Bank and International
Monetary Fund, to build support for the region. The AP is led by demands from
the region and its approach varies significantly from country to country in line with
individual country contexts.
Ongoing support in Libya
The UK supported the Libyan people as they sought greater freedom after 42
years of repression under the Qadhafi regime. At the beginning of the revolution
in March 2011, the UK was at the forefront of pushing for two UN Security Council
Resolutions to provide the international community with the legal mandate to take
all necessary measures to protect civilians from the threat of attack and to enforce
a no-fly zone.
Together with international partners, we are now providing a range of
assistance to the new Libyan government. It faces significant challenges as it seeks
to build a prosperous, open and democratic country which supports the rule of
law and human rights. But the amount that has been achieved since the end of the
conflict - most notably the successful national democratic elections held for the
first time in nearly half a century - shows the determination of the Libyan people
to rebuild their country after decades of misrule.
Finding an end to the crisis in Syria
The government is working with international partners to bring about an end
to violence and achieve a managed political transition. We have already
committed over £700 million to help alleviate the humanitarian crisis and help the
Syrian people prepare economically and politically for a new government. More on
the crisis in Syria.
Working to destroy the threat of ISIL
The government is working with international partners to dismantle and
ultimately destroy the terrorist organisation ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the
Levant also known as Islamic State, Da’esh or ISIS). We are undertaking a wide
range of political, humanitarian and military activity to stop ISIL and support Iraq
and Syria. The UK is playing an active role with airstrikes and intelligence gathering
as part of the wider international strategy against ISIL involving Arab, US, and
European nations. Find out more about the UK government’s actions to counter
ISIL.
The Middle East Peace Process
Resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of our top foreign policy
priorities. This conflict matters to British national security, and to the security of the
entire region, and we will take every opportunity to help promote a peaceful
2-state solution.
Stabilising Yemen
The UK is providing Yemen with £196 million from 2012 to 2015. Most of this
money will go to alleviate humanitarian suffering and to the Social Fund for
Development to improve rural infrastructure and expand social is
supporting Yemen’s long-term development, stability and security. More
on Yemen.
Broader Middle East and North Africa Initiative (BMENA)
The G8’s Broader Middle East and North Africa (BMENA) initiative is an
annual dialogue, run since 2004, between the governments and civil society
representatives of the G8 and the BMENA countries and territories. In 2013 the UK,
as the G8 Presidency, is co-chairing the BMENA initiative with the Egyptian
government.
Background
The Arab Spring has shown that demands for political and economic freedom
will spread widely by themselves, not because Western nations advocate these
values, but because all people everywhere aspire to these freedoms.
In his speech to the National Assembly in Kuwait on 22 February 2011, the
Prime Minister set out the UK’s approach to the Arab Spring, upholding universal
values, rights and freedoms, with respect for the different cultures, histories and
traditions of the countries in the region.
发布者:admin,转转请注明出处:http://www.yc00.com/web/1710562483a1777848.html
评论列表(0条)